VONG vs. VTHR
VONG (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF) and VTHR (Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VONG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index, while VTHR is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 3000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VONG returned 17.84%/yr vs 14.60%/yr for VTHR. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.06% expense ratio.
Performance
VONG vs. VTHR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VONG achieves a 3.05% return, which is significantly lower than VTHR's 10.84% return. Over the past 10 years, VONG has outperformed VTHR with an annualized return of 17.84%, while VTHR has yielded a comparatively lower 14.60% annualized return.
VONG
- 1D
- -1.90%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 2.16%
- YTD
- 3.05%
- 1Y
- 14.30%
- 3Y*
- 20.80%
- 5Y*
- 12.58%
- 10Y*
- 17.84%
VTHR
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 8.32%
- YTD
- 10.84%
- 1Y
- 21.62%
- 3Y*
- 19.69%
- 5Y*
- 12.01%
- 10Y*
- 14.60%
VONG vs. VTHR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 3.05% | 18.45% | 33.20% | 42.67% | -29.18% | 27.60% | 38.30% | 36.06% | -1.53% | 30.05% |
VTHR Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF | 10.84% | 16.99% | 23.57% | 25.92% | -19.20% | 25.49% | 20.93% | 30.82% | -5.65% | 21.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between VONG and VTHR is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010 | 0.89 |
The correlation between VONG and VTHR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
VONG vs. VTHR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VONG
VTHR
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
VONG
VTHR
Consumer Cyclical
VONG
VTHR
Communication Services
VONG
VTHR
Healthcare
VONG
VTHR
Industrials
VONG
VTHR
Financial Services
VONG
VTHR
Consumer Defensive
VONG
VTHR
Utilities
VONG
VTHR
Real Estate
VONG
VTHR
Energy
VONG
VTHR
Basic Materials
VONG
VTHR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VONG vs. VTHR — Risk / Return Rank
VONG
VTHR
VONG vs. VTHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VONG | VTHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.30 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 2.44 | -1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.80 | 10.70 | -7.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VONG vs. VTHR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VONG drawdown since its inception was -32.72%, smaller than the maximum VTHR drawdown of -34.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONG and VTHR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VONG | VTHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.72% | -34.61% | +1.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.23% | -8.91% | -7.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.27% | -19.36% | -3.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.72% | -25.06% | -7.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.72% | -34.61% | +1.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.45% | -0.78% | -4.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.88% | -4.02% | -0.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.12% | 2.03% | +3.09% |
Volatility
VONG vs. VTHR - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a higher volatility of 6.55% compared to Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) at 3.99%. This indicates that VONG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VONG | VTHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.55% | 3.99% | +2.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.37% | 10.17% | +3.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.70% | 12.86% | +3.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.56% | 17.40% | +4.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.95% | 17.83% | +3.12% |
VONG vs. VTHR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VONG and VTHR have an expense ratio of 0.06%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VONG vs. VTHR - Dividend Comparison
VONG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than VTHR's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.46% | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% |
VTHR Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF | 1.03% | 1.08% | 1.19% | 1.47% | 1.52% | 1.16% | 1.37% | 1.65% | 1.89% | 1.63% | 1.82% | 1.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, VONG and VTHR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VONG has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to VTHR (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONG dropped -32.72% vs VTHR's -34.61%.
On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 17.84% vs 14.60% for VTHR. Both ETFs have the same 0.06% expense ratio. On volatility, VTHR has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 17.84% return vs 14.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VONG and VTHR have the same expense ratio: 0.06% per year.
VTHR has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.46% for VONG.
VONG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VTHR is Large Cap Blend Equities. VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index, while VTHR tracks Russell 3000 Index.
VTHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VONG and VTHR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer