PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VONG vs. SPYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VONG vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VONG achieves a 2.86% return, which is significantly lower than SPYM's 10.37% return. Over the past 10 years, VONG has outperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 17.71%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively lower 15.13% annualized return.


VONG

1D
1.58%
1M
-1.54%
6M
6.09%
YTD
2.86%
1Y
11.99%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
12.39%
10Y*
17.71%
ALL TIME*
16.66%

SPYM

1D
0.82%
1M
0.22%
6M
11.07%
YTD
10.37%
1Y
20.44%
3Y*
19.85%
5Y*
13.02%
10Y*
15.13%
ALL TIME*
11.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VONG vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
2.86%18.45%33.20%42.67%-29.18%27.60%38.30%36.06%-1.53%30.05%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
10.37%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%

Correlation

The correlation between VONG and SPYM is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.87

The correlation between VONG and SPYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

VONG vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VONG
SPYM

Technology

54.3%
38.5%

Communication Services

16.2%
9.9%

Industrials

9.0%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
9.5%

Healthcare

5.4%
8.9%

Financial Services

4.2%
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
4.5%

Energy

0.5%
3.0%

Real Estate

0.4%
1.8%

Utilities

0.3%
2.2%

Basic Materials

0.3%
1.7%

Technology

VONG
54.3%
SPYM
38.5%

Communication Services

VONG
16.2%
SPYM
9.9%

Industrials

VONG
9.0%
SPYM
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VONG
8.4%
SPYM
9.5%

Healthcare

VONG
5.4%
SPYM
8.9%

Financial Services

VONG
4.2%
SPYM
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

VONG
1.2%
SPYM
4.5%

Energy

VONG
0.5%
SPYM
3.0%

Real Estate

VONG
0.4%
SPYM
1.8%

Utilities

VONG
0.3%
SPYM
2.2%

Basic Materials

VONG
0.3%
SPYM
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VONG vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VONG
VONG Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VONG vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VONGSPYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.29

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

2.31

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.31

10.01

-7.70

VONG vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VONG Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VONG and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VONG vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VONG drawdown since its inception was -32.72%, smaller than the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONG and SPYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VONGSPYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.72%

-54.46%

+21.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.23%

-8.90%

-7.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.27%

-18.72%

-4.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.72%

-24.48%

-8.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.72%

-33.87%

+1.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.62%

-1.20%

-4.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-7.12%

+2.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.20%

2.05%

+3.15%

Volatility

VONG vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a higher volatility of 6.42% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 3.37%. This indicates that VONG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VONGSPYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.42%

3.37%

+3.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.67%

10.07%

+3.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.96%

12.59%

+4.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.58%

16.90%

+4.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.97%

18.00%

+2.97%

VONG vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VONG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VONG vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

VONG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than SPYM's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.47%0.45%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, VONG and SPYM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VONG has higher volatility (6.42%) compared to SPYM (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONG dropped -32.72% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 17.71% vs 15.13% for SPYM. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 17.71% return vs 15.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VONG.

SPYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.47% for VONG.

VONG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYM is S&P 500. VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VONG and 0.02% for SPYM.

SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VONG and SPYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer