VONG vs. RFDA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

VONG (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF) and RFDA (RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. VONG is passively managed, while RFDA is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, VONG returned 18.39%/yr vs 13.39%/yr for RFDA. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VONG charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for RFDA.

Performance

VONG vs. RFDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VONG achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly lower than RFDA's 10.77% return. Over the past 10 years, VONG has outperformed RFDA with an annualized return of 18.39%, while RFDA has yielded a comparatively lower 13.39% annualized return.

VONG

• 1D: -1.57%
• 1M: -3.99%
• YTD: 1.56%
• 6M: 0.27%
• 1Y: 18.03%
• 3Y*: 21.88%
• 5Y*: 13.07%
• 10Y*: 18.39%

RFDA

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 10.77%
• 6M: 9.90%
• 1Y: 26.59%
• 3Y*: 18.80%
• 5Y*: 12.89%
• 10Y*: 13.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VONG vs. RFDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF	1.56%	18.45%	33.20%	42.67%	-29.18%	27.60%	38.30%	36.06%	-1.53%	30.05%
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF	10.77%	16.42%	20.12%	16.98%	-8.58%	25.94%	11.26%	27.15%	-9.27%	19.86%

Correlation

The correlation between VONG and RFDA is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2016	0.81

The correlation between VONG and RFDA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

VONG vs. RFDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VONG	RFDA
Technology	54.1%	21.1%
Consumer Cyclical	12.5%	7.4%
Communication Services	12.0%	8.3%
Healthcare	6.9%	9.7%
Industrials	4.9%	8.6%
Financial Services	4.8%	14.4%
Consumer Defensive	2.5%	7.0%
Utilities	1.0%	4.8%
Real Estate	0.4%	4.9%
Energy	0.4%	11.7%
Basic Materials	0.3%	1.9%

Return for Risk

VONG vs. RFDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VONG

VONG Risk / Return Rank: 29
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 30
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 27

RFDA

RFDA Risk / Return Rank: 81
RFDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
RFDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
RFDA Omega Ratio Rank: 78
RFDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
RFDA Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VONG vs. RFDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VONG	RFDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	2.28	-1.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.58	3.14	-1.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.42	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.12	4.90	-3.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.64	17.52	-13.88

VONG vs. RFDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VONG Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the RFDA Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VONG and RFDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VONG vs. RFDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VONG drawdown since its inception was -32.72%, smaller than the maximum RFDA drawdown of -34.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONG and RFDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	VONG	RFDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.72%	-34.60%	+1.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.23%	-5.45%	-10.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.27%	-19.35%	-3.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.72%	-19.35%	-13.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.72%	-34.60%	+1.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.82%	-1.67%	-5.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.88%	-3.73%	-1.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.97%	1.52%	+3.45%

Volatility

VONG vs. RFDA - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) at 3.29%. This indicates that VONG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VONG	RFDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.04%	3.29%	+2.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.59%	8.77%	+3.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.17%	11.72%	+4.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.45%	15.75%	+5.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.92%	16.87%	+4.05%

VONG vs. RFDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

VONG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than RFDA's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

VONG vs. RFDA - Dividend Comparison

VONG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than RFDA's 1.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF	1.80%	1.89%	2.23%	2.68%	3.57%	1.44%	1.62%	1.87%	2.44%	1.90%	0.98%	0.00%
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF	0.47%	0.45%	0.55%	0.71%	0.98%	0.58%	0.77%	1.03%	1.18%	1.19%	1.48%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VONG and RFDA in my portfolio?

VONG and RFDA have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VONG or RFDA?

VONG has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to RFDA (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONG dropped -32.72% vs RFDA's -34.60%.

Which ETF is better, VONG or RFDA?

On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 18.39% vs 13.39% for RFDA. On fees, VONG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, RFDA has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VONG or RFDA?

Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 18.39% return vs 13.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VONG or RFDA?

VONG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for RFDA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VONG or RFDA?

RFDA has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 0.47% for VONG.

What is the main difference between VONG and RFDA?

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VONG and 0.52% for RFDA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RFDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.