VONG vs. IQM

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

VONG (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF) and IQM (Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. VONG is passively managed, while IQM is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VONG returned 15.98%/yr vs 22.83%/yr for IQM. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VONG charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IQM.

Performance

VONG vs. IQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VONG achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly lower than IQM's 40.70% return.

VONG

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 6.89%
• YTD: 8.61%
• 6M: 7.89%
• 1Y: 28.25%
• 3Y*: 25.48%
• 5Y*: 15.98%
• 10Y*: 18.77%

IQM

• 1D: 3.49%
• 1M: 12.88%
• YTD: 40.70%
• 6M: 40.33%
• 1Y: 78.30%
• 3Y*: 37.79%
• 5Y*: 22.83%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VONG vs. IQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF	8.61%	18.45%	33.20%	42.67%	-29.18%	27.60%	44.92%
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF	40.70%	30.76%	31.03%	41.06%	-33.36%	25.18%	78.48%

Correlation

The correlation between VONG and IQM is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2020	0.89

The correlation between VONG and IQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

VONG vs. IQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VONG	IQM
Technology	51.4%	65.9%
Communication Services	13.2%	2.1%
Consumer Cyclical	13.2%	4.1%
Healthcare	7.1%	1.1%
Industrials	5.7%	19.9%
Financial Services	5.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.7%	-
Real Estate	0.4%	-
Energy	0.4%	2.7%
Basic Materials	0.3%	-
Utilities	0.3%	3.3%

Return for Risk

VONG vs. IQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VONG

VONG Risk / Return Rank: 46
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 51
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 38

IQM

IQM Risk / Return Rank: 80
IQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
IQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
IQM Omega Ratio Rank: 73
IQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
IQM Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VONG vs. IQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VONG	IQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	2.79	-0.93
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	3.20	-0.70
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.44	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.79	5.40	-3.61
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.02	17.71	-11.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VONG vs. IQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VONG Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is lower than the IQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VONG and IQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VONG	IQM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.85	2.79	-0.93
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	0.79	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.90	0.97	-0.06

Drawdowns

VONG vs. IQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VONG drawdown since its inception was -32.72%, smaller than the maximum IQM drawdown of -44.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONG and IQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	VONG	IQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.72%	-44.91%	+12.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.23%	-14.71%	-1.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.27%	-30.42%	+7.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.72%	-44.91%	+12.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.35%	0.00%	-0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.88%	-12.25%	+7.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.83%	4.49%	+0.34%

Volatility

VONG vs. IQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) is 3.23%, while Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) has a volatility of 9.15%. This indicates that VONG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VONG	IQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.23%	9.15%	-5.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.53%	23.00%	-11.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.32%	28.27%	-12.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.33%	28.91%	-7.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.87%	30.73%	-9.86%

VONG vs. IQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VONG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IQM's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

VONG vs. IQM - Dividend Comparison

VONG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, while IQM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF	0.42%	0.45%	0.55%	0.71%	0.98%	0.58%	0.77%	1.03%	1.18%	1.19%	1.48%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VONG and IQM in my portfolio?

VONG and IQM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VONG or IQM?

IQM has higher volatility (9.15%) compared to VONG (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONG dropped -32.72% vs IQM's -44.91%.

Which ETF is better, VONG or IQM?

On 5-year performance, IQM leads with 22.83% vs 15.98% for VONG. On fees, VONG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VONG has been the lower-risk option at 3.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VONG or IQM?

Over the 5-year period, IQM has performed better with a 22.83% return vs 15.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VONG or IQM?

VONG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IQM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VONG or IQM?

VONG has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.00% for IQM.

What is the main difference between VONG and IQM?

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VONG and 0.50% for IQM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.