PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VONE vs. USMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VONE vs. USMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VONE achieves a 10.82% return, which is significantly higher than USMV's 3.64% return. Over the past 10 years, VONE has outperformed USMV with an annualized return of 14.92%, while USMV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.48% annualized return.


VONE

1D
0.45%
1M
1.76%
6M
8.82%
YTD
10.82%
1Y
21.19%
3Y*
20.01%
5Y*
12.49%
10Y*
14.92%

USMV

1D
-0.96%
1M
1.18%
6M
3.50%
YTD
3.64%
1Y
5.50%
3Y*
11.07%
5Y*
6.93%
10Y*
9.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VONE vs. USMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VONE
Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF
10.82%17.21%24.51%26.41%-19.14%26.49%20.95%31.12%-4.84%21.55%
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
3.64%7.65%15.74%10.33%-9.43%20.85%5.64%27.69%1.33%18.91%

Correlation

The correlation between VONE and USMV is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between VONE and USMV has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VONE vs. USMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VONE
USMV

Technology

37.4%
33.9%

Financial Services

11.2%
11.7%

Communication Services

10.4%
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
5.7%

Industrials

8.7%
6.1%

Healthcare

8.5%
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
9.4%

Energy

3.3%
2.7%

Real Estate

2.1%
2.5%

Utilities

2.1%
6.9%

Basic Materials

1.9%
2.4%

Technology

VONE
37.4%
USMV
33.9%

Financial Services

VONE
11.2%
USMV
11.7%

Communication Services

VONE
10.4%
USMV
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VONE
10.0%
USMV
5.7%

Industrials

VONE
8.7%
USMV
6.1%

Healthcare

VONE
8.5%
USMV
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

VONE
4.4%
USMV
9.4%

Energy

VONE
3.3%
USMV
2.7%

Real Estate

VONE
2.1%
USMV
2.5%

Utilities

VONE
2.1%
USMV
6.9%

Basic Materials

VONE
1.9%
USMV
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VONE vs. USMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VONE
VONE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VONE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VONE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

USMV
USMV Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
USMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMV Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
USMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMV Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VONE vs. USMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VONEUSMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.11

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

0.86

+1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.50

2.80

+7.70

VONE vs. USMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VONE Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the USMV Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VONE and USMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VONE vs. USMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VONE drawdown since its inception was -34.66%, roughly equal to the maximum USMV drawdown of -33.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONE and USMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VONEUSMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.66%

-33.10%

-1.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.85%

-6.46%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

-9.36%

-9.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.12%

-17.93%

-7.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.66%

-33.10%

-1.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-1.49%

+1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.89%

-2.87%

-1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

1.97%

+0.05%

Volatility

VONE vs. USMV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) has a higher volatility of 3.75% compared to iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) at 2.75%. This indicates that VONE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VONEUSMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

2.75%

+1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.95%

6.30%

+3.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.61%

8.52%

+4.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.19%

12.37%

+4.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.23%

14.50%

+3.73%

VONE vs. USMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VONE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than USMV's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VONE vs. USMV - Dividend Comparison

VONE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than USMV's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
1.49%1.49%1.67%1.82%1.62%1.26%1.81%1.88%2.12%1.77%2.22%2.02%
VONE
Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF
1.02%1.07%1.20%1.40%1.59%1.16%1.45%1.65%1.96%1.69%1.89%1.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


VONE and USMV have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VONE has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to USMV (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONE dropped -34.66% vs USMV's -33.10%.

On 10-year performance, VONE leads with 14.92% vs 9.48% for USMV. On fees, VONE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, USMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VONE has performed better with a 14.92% return vs 9.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VONE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for USMV.

USMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 1.02% for VONE.

VONE tracks Russell 1000 Index, while USMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VONE and 0.15% for USMV.

VONE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VONE and USMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer