VONE vs. PSCX
VONE (Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF) and PSCX (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. VONE is passively managed, while PSCX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VONE returned 13.18%/yr vs 8.49%/yr for PSCX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VONE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PSCX.
Performance
VONE vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VONE achieves a 11.05% return, which is significantly higher than PSCX's 5.25% return.
VONE
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 4.62%
- YTD
- 11.05%
- 6M
- 10.88%
- 1Y
- 27.69%
- 3Y*
- 22.42%
- 5Y*
- 13.18%
- 10Y*
- 15.24%
PSCX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 5.25%
- 6M
- 6.09%
- 1Y
- 15.59%
- 3Y*
- 13.00%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- —
VONE vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VONE Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF | 11.05% | 17.21% | 24.51% | 26.41% | -19.14% | 26.49% | 1.32% |
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | 5.25% | 12.08% | 13.27% | 16.57% | -7.35% | 9.03% | 0.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between VONE and PSCX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2020 | 0.90 |
The correlation between VONE and PSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
VONE vs. PSCX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VONE
PSCX
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
VONE
PSCX
Financial Services
VONE
PSCX
Communication Services
VONE
PSCX
Consumer Cyclical
VONE
PSCX
Industrials
VONE
PSCX
Healthcare
VONE
PSCX
Consumer Defensive
VONE
PSCX
Energy
VONE
PSCX
Utilities
VONE
PSCX
Real Estate
VONE
PSCX
Basic Materials
VONE
PSCX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VONE vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank
VONE
PSCX
VONE vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VONE | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.58 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.14 | 3.72 | -0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.49 | 19.07 | -4.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VONE | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 2.84 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 1.21 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 1.28 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
VONE vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VONE drawdown since its inception was -34.66%, which is greater than PSCX's maximum drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONE and PSCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VONE | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.66% | -10.20% | -24.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.85% | -4.20% | -4.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.06% | -9.61% | -9.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.12% | -10.20% | -14.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | 0.00% | -0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.91% | -1.86% | -2.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 0.82% | +1.10% |
Volatility
VONE vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) has a higher volatility of 2.77% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) at 0.86%. This indicates that VONE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VONE | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.77% | 0.86% | +1.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.00% | 4.21% | +4.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.97% | 5.52% | +6.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.08% | 7.07% | +10.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.25% | 6.96% | +11.29% |
VONE vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VONE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
VONE vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison
VONE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, while PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VONE Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF | 0.99% | 1.07% | 1.20% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 1.16% | 1.45% | 1.65% | 1.96% | 1.69% | 1.89% | 1.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, VONE and PSCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VONE has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to PSCX (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONE dropped -34.66% vs PSCX's -10.20%.
On 5-year performance, VONE leads with 13.18% vs 8.49% for PSCX. On fees, VONE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, PSCX has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VONE has performed better with a 13.18% return vs 8.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VONE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSCX.
VONE has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.00% for PSCX.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VONE and 0.75% for PSCX.
PSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VONE and PSCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer