VONE vs. CNAV

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

VONE (Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF) and CNAV (Mohr Company Nav ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. VONE is passively managed, while CNAV is actively managed. Over the past year, VONE returned 23.31% vs 41.94% for CNAV. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. VONE charges 0.08%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for CNAV.

Performance

VONE vs. CNAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VONE achieves a 13.29% return, which is significantly lower than CNAV's 28.97% return.

VONE

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 2.26%
• 6M: 12.61%
• YTD: 13.29%
• 1Y: 23.31%
• 3Y*: 21.12%
• 5Y*: 12.53%
• 10Y*: 15.05%
• ALL TIME*: 14.61%

CNAV

• 1D: -1.41%
• 1M: -9.00%
• 6M: 23.74%
• YTD: 28.97%
• 1Y: 41.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 28.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	$276.46K	$267.52K	$332.75K
VONE Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF	$25.73M	$27.06M	$30.27M

VONE vs. CNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
VONE Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF	13.29%	17.21%	2.88%
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	28.97%	16.80%	6.05%

Correlation

The correlation between VONE and CNAV is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2024	0.77

The correlation between VONE and CNAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

VONE vs. CNAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VONE

VONE Risk / Return Rank: 70
VONE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
VONE Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
VONE Omega Ratio Rank: 67
VONE Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
VONE Martin Ratio Rank: 78

CNAV

CNAV Risk / Return Rank: 43
CNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
CNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
CNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 43
CNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
CNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VONE vs. CNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VONE	CNAV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	1.23	+0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.53	1.72	+0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.23	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.65	1.63	+1.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.34	6.90	+4.44

VONE vs. CNAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VONE Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the CNAV Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VONE and CNAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VONE vs. CNAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VONE drawdown since its inception was -34.66%, which is greater than CNAV's maximum drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONE and CNAV.

Drawdown Indicators

	VONE	CNAV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.66%	-30.06%	-4.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.85%	-25.80%	+16.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.26%	-17.29%	+17.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.88%	-5.92%	+2.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.06%	6.09%	-4.03%

Volatility

VONE vs. CNAV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) is 4.00%, while Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) has a volatility of 14.80%. This indicates that VONE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VONE	CNAV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.00%	14.80%	-10.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.24%	31.72%	-21.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.89%	34.39%	-21.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.22%	31.49%	-14.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.26%	31.49%	-13.23%

VONE vs. CNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VONE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAV's 1.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

VONE vs. CNAV - Dividend Comparison

VONE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, while CNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VONE Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF	0.99%	1.07%	1.20%	1.40%	1.59%	1.16%	1.45%	1.65%	1.96%	1.69%	1.89%	1.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VONE and CNAV in my portfolio?

VONE and CNAV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VONE or CNAV?

CNAV has higher volatility (14.80%) compared to VONE (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONE dropped -34.66% vs CNAV's -30.06%.

Which ETF is better, VONE or CNAV?

On 1-year performance, CNAV leads with 41.94% vs 23.31% for VONE. On fees, VONE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VONE has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VONE or CNAV?

Over the 1-year period, CNAV has performed better with a 41.94% return vs 23.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VONE or CNAV?

VONE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VONE or CNAV?

VONE has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.00% for CNAV.

What is the main difference between VONE and CNAV?

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VONE and 1.31% for CNAV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VONE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.