VONE vs. BUFH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VONE (Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VONE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Index, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VONE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.

Performance

VONE vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VONE achieves a 10.56% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.45% return.

VONE

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 4.95%
• YTD: 10.56%
• 6M: 10.53%
• 1Y: 27.04%
• 3Y*: 22.12%
• 5Y*: 13.08%
• 10Y*: 15.25%

BUFH

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 2.45%
• 6M: 2.82%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VONE vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
VONE Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF	10.56%	12.66%
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF	2.45%	3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between VONE and BUFH is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.74

Return for Risk

VONE vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VONE

VONE Risk / Return Rank: 67
VONE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
VONE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
VONE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
VONE Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
VONE Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VONE vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VONE	BUFH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.27	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.13	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.07	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.15	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VONE	BUFH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.27	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	2.91	-2.06

Drawdowns

VONE vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VONE drawdown since its inception was -34.66%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONE and BUFH.

Drawdown Indicators

	VONE	BUFH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.66%	-1.53%	-33.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.70%	-0.05%	-0.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.91%	-0.18%	-3.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.92%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	VONE	BUFH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.82%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.99%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.97%	2.37%	+9.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.08%	2.37%	+14.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.25%	2.37%	+15.88%

VONE vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

VONE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

VONE vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison

VONE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VONE Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF	0.99%	1.07%	1.20%	1.40%	1.59%	1.16%	1.45%	1.65%	1.96%	1.69%	1.89%	1.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VONE and BUFH in my portfolio?

VONE and BUFH have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VONE or BUFH?

On fees, VONE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VONE or BUFH?

VONE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VONE or BUFH?

VONE has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.

What is the main difference between VONE and BUFH?

VONE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VONE and 0.95% for BUFH.