VOLT vs. FLKR

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

VOLT (Tema Electrification ETF) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOLT is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Tema, while FLKR is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. VOLT is actively managed, while FLKR is passively managed. Over the past year, VOLT returned 65.72% vs 212.42% for FLKR. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VOLT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLKR.

Performance

VOLT vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOLT achieves a 39.12% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 112.26% return.

VOLT

• 1D: 2.05%
• 1M: 1.33%
• YTD: 39.12%
• 6M: 37.48%
• 1Y: 65.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLKR

• 1D: 7.15%
• 1M: 17.17%
• YTD: 112.26%
• 6M: 128.12%
• 1Y: 212.42%
• 3Y*: 49.62%
• 5Y*: 19.64%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VOLT vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF	39.12%	25.92%	-8.98%
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	112.26%	91.91%	-7.01%

Correlation

The correlation between VOLT and FLKR is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024	0.51

The correlation between VOLT and FLKR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOLT vs. FLKR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VOLT	FLKR
Industrials	46.7%	14.6%
Utilities	31.8%	0.3%
Technology	12.2%	62.9%
Energy	5.1%	0.7%
Consumer Cyclical	3.4%	6.3%
Financial Services	0.5%	7.5%
Basic Materials	-	1.9%
Communication Services	-	2.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.4%
Healthcare	-	2.4%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

VOLT vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOLT

VOLT Risk / Return Rank: 92
VOLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
VOLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
VOLT Omega Ratio Rank: 90
VOLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
VOLT Martin Ratio Rank: 91

FLKR

FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 96
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VOLT vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VOLT	FLKR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.10	4.63	-1.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.86	4.26	-0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.63	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.89	9.29	-2.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.39	32.27	-12.88

VOLT vs. FLKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOLT Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is lower than the FLKR Sharpe Ratio of 4.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOLT and FLKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VOLT vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOLT drawdown since its inception was -23.40%, smaller than the maximum FLKR drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOLT and FLKR.

Drawdown Indicators

	VOLT	FLKR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.40%	-50.06%	+26.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.59%	-23.03%	+13.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-49.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.80%	-2.76%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.19%	-22.02%	+16.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.40%	6.61%	-3.21%

Volatility

VOLT vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) is 9.42%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 26.71%. This indicates that VOLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VOLT	FLKR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.42%	26.71%	-17.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.28%	42.52%	-24.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.34%	46.33%	-24.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.42%	29.77%	-5.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.42%	28.47%	-4.05%

VOLT vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOLT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

VOLT vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison

VOLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than FLKR's 1.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	1.82%	3.87%	7.08%	2.28%	3.13%	2.12%	0.99%	2.09%	1.86%	1.02%
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF	0.33%	0.46%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VOLT and FLKR in my portfolio?

VOLT and FLKR have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VOLT or FLKR?

FLKR has higher volatility (26.71%) compared to VOLT (9.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOLT dropped -23.40% vs FLKR's -50.06%.

Which ETF is better, VOLT or FLKR?

On 1-year performance, FLKR leads with 212.42% vs 65.72% for VOLT. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VOLT has been the lower-risk option at 9.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VOLT or FLKR?

Over the 1-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 212.42% return vs 65.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VOLT or FLKR?

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for VOLT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VOLT or FLKR?

FLKR has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.33% for VOLT.

What is the main difference between VOLT and FLKR?

VOLT is categorized as Energy Equities, while FLKR is Asia Pacific Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tema and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for VOLT and 0.09% for FLKR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.63 vs 3.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.