VNQI vs. VYM
VNQI (Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF) and VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VNQI is a REIT fund tracking the S&P Global ex-U.S. Property Index, while VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VNQI returned 2.21%/yr vs 11.84%/yr for VYM. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VNQI charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VYM.
Performance
VNQI vs. VYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VNQI achieves a -2.14% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 12.42% return. Over the past 10 years, VNQI has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of 2.21%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.84% annualized return.
VNQI
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -4.57%
- YTD
- -2.14%
- 6M
- -0.84%
- 1Y
- 5.67%
- 3Y*
- 8.33%
- 5Y*
- -1.57%
- 10Y*
- 2.21%
VYM
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- 12.42%
- 6M
- 11.92%
- 1Y
- 26.61%
- 3Y*
- 19.06%
- 5Y*
- 11.47%
- 10Y*
- 11.84%
VNQI vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNQI Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF | -2.14% | 21.38% | -2.22% | 6.99% | -22.94% | 5.93% | -7.22% | 21.59% | -9.44% | 26.91% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 12.42% | 15.42% | 17.60% | 6.57% | -0.43% | 26.20% | 1.15% | 24.06% | -5.92% | 16.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between VNQI and VYM is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2010 | 0.66 |
The correlation between VNQI and VYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
VNQI vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VNQI
VYM
Real Estate
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
VNQI
VYM
Financial Services
VNQI
VYM
Consumer Cyclical
VNQI
VYM
Industrials
VNQI
VYM
Energy
VNQI
VYM
Basic Materials
VNQI
VYM
Technology
VNQI
VYM
Utilities
VNQI
VYM
Consumer Defensive
VNQI
VYM
Healthcare
VNQI
VYM
Communication Services
VNQI
-
VYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VNQI vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank
VNQI
VYM
VNQI vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VNQI | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.47 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | 3.99 | -3.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.17 | 15.01 | -13.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VNQI | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 | 2.61 | -2.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | 0.83 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 | 0.73 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.51 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
VNQI vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VNQI drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNQI and VYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VNQI | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.35% | -56.98% | +18.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.78% | -6.69% | -8.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.35% | -14.46% | -1.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.75% | -15.84% | -19.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.35% | -35.21% | -3.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.62% | -0.48% | -11.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.89% | -7.19% | -3.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.84% | 1.78% | +3.06% |
Volatility
VNQI vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.72%. This indicates that VNQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VNQI | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 2.72% | +1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.44% | 7.66% | +3.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.43% | 10.26% | +3.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.50% | 13.96% | +1.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.06% | 16.34% | -0.28% |
VNQI vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VNQI has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VNQI vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison
VNQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, more than VYM's 2.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNQI Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF | 4.81% | 4.70% | 5.16% | 3.74% | 0.57% | 6.48% | 0.93% | 7.58% | 4.62% | 3.86% | 5.18% | 2.86% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.19% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VNQI and VYM have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VNQI has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to VYM (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNQI dropped -38.35% vs VYM's -56.98%.
On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.84% vs 2.21% for VNQI. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.84% return vs 2.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for VNQI.
VNQI has the higher dividend yield at 4.81%, compared with 2.19% for VYM.
VNQI is categorized as REIT, while VYM is Dividend. VNQI tracks S&P Global ex-U.S. Property Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VNQI and 0.04% for VYM.
VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VNQI and VYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer