VNQI vs. IWN

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

VNQI (Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF) and IWN (iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VNQI is a REIT fund tracking the S&P Global ex-U.S. Property Index, while IWN is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VNQI returned 2.74%/yr vs 10.58%/yr for IWN. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VNQI charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for IWN.

Performance

VNQI vs. IWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNQI achieves a -0.33% return, which is significantly lower than IWN's 20.82% return. Over the past 10 years, VNQI has underperformed IWN with an annualized return of 2.74%, while IWN has yielded a comparatively higher 10.58% annualized return.

VNQI

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: -3.12%
• YTD: -0.33%
• 6M: 0.85%
• 1Y: 5.87%
• 3Y*: 8.59%
• 5Y*: -1.50%
• 10Y*: 2.74%

IWN

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: 4.34%
• YTD: 20.82%
• 6M: 17.48%
• 1Y: 42.26%
• 3Y*: 17.41%
• 5Y*: 6.89%
• 10Y*: 10.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNQI vs. IWN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VNQI Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF	-0.33%	21.38%	-2.22%	6.99%	-22.94%	5.93%	-7.22%	21.59%	-9.44%	26.91%
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF	20.82%	12.40%	7.63%	14.56%	-14.77%	27.96%	4.66%	22.01%	-13.01%	7.69%

Correlation

The correlation between VNQI and IWN is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2010	0.63

The correlation between VNQI and IWN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

VNQI vs. IWN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VNQI	IWN
Real Estate	91.2%	10.2%
Financial Services	1.9%	24.2%
Consumer Cyclical	1.1%	8.7%
Industrials	0.7%	11.1%
Energy	0.3%	9.2%
Basic Materials	0.3%	5.4%
Technology	0.2%	12.4%
Utilities	0.1%	5.7%
Consumer Defensive	0.1%	2.0%
Healthcare	0.0%	8.8%
Communication Services	-	1.6%

Return for Risk

VNQI vs. IWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNQI

VNQI Risk / Return Rank: 16
VNQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
VNQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
VNQI Omega Ratio Rank: 16
VNQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
VNQI Martin Ratio Rank: 15

IWN

IWN Risk / Return Rank: 85
IWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
IWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
IWN Omega Ratio Rank: 78
IWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
IWN Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNQI vs. IWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) and iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VNQI	IWN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.43	2.35	-1.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.70	3.27	-2.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.40	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.40	5.02	-4.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.13	16.91	-15.78

VNQI vs. IWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNQI Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the IWN Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNQI and IWN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VNQI vs. IWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNQI drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, smaller than the maximum IWN drawdown of -61.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNQI and IWN.

Drawdown Indicators

	VNQI	IWN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.35%	-61.55%	+23.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.78%	-8.45%	-6.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.35%	-26.70%	+10.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.55%	-26.70%	-8.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.35%	-46.08%	+7.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.99%	0.00%	-9.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.89%	-10.15%	-0.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.19%	2.51%	+2.68%

Volatility

VNQI vs. IWN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) is 4.62%, while iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) has a volatility of 5.80%. This indicates that VNQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VNQI	IWN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.62%	5.80%	-1.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.75%	12.25%	-0.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.73%	18.09%	-4.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.54%	21.47%	-5.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.07%	23.41%	-7.34%

VNQI vs. IWN - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNQI has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IWN's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VNQI vs. IWN - Dividend Comparison

VNQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than IWN's 1.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWN iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF	1.42%	1.70%	1.80%	2.04%	2.12%	1.48%	1.60%	1.92%	1.99%	1.78%	1.74%	2.15%
VNQI Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF	4.72%	4.70%	5.16%	3.74%	0.57%	6.48%	0.93%	7.58%	4.62%	3.86%	5.18%	2.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VNQI and IWN in my portfolio?

VNQI and IWN have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VNQI or IWN?

IWN has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to VNQI (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNQI dropped -38.35% vs IWN's -61.55%.

Which ETF is better, VNQI or IWN?

On 10-year performance, IWN leads with 10.58% vs 2.74% for VNQI. On fees, VNQI is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, VNQI has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VNQI or IWN?

Over the 10-year period, IWN has performed better with a 10.58% return vs 2.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VNQI or IWN?

VNQI is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for IWN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VNQI or IWN?

VNQI has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 1.42% for IWN.

What is the main difference between VNQI and IWN?

VNQI is categorized as REIT, while IWN is Small Cap Value Equities. VNQI tracks S&P Global ex-U.S. Property Index, while IWN tracks Russell 2000 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VNQI and 0.24% for IWN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.