VNQ vs. VIS
VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF) and VIS (Vanguard Industrials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VNQ is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while VIS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VNQ returned 5.65%/yr vs 14.22%/yr for VIS. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VNQ charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VIS.
Performance
VNQ vs. VIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VNQ achieves a 12.51% return, which is significantly lower than VIS's 15.65% return. Over the past 10 years, VNQ has underperformed VIS with an annualized return of 5.65%, while VIS has yielded a comparatively higher 14.22% annualized return.
VNQ
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- 12.51%
- 6M
- 12.32%
- 1Y
- 12.92%
- 3Y*
- 10.14%
- 5Y*
- 2.55%
- 10Y*
- 5.65%
VIS
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- YTD
- 15.65%
- 6M
- 14.50%
- 1Y
- 27.46%
- 3Y*
- 21.45%
- 5Y*
- 13.11%
- 10Y*
- 14.22%
VNQ vs. VIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 12.51% | 3.24% | 4.81% | 11.85% | -26.25% | 40.54% | -4.61% | 28.91% | -6.03% | 4.90% |
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 15.65% | 18.57% | 16.85% | 22.50% | -8.57% | 20.80% | 12.34% | 30.09% | -14.01% | 21.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between VNQ and VIS is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2004 | 0.63 |
The correlation between VNQ and VIS shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VNQ vs. VIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VNQ
VIS
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
Energy
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
VNQ
VIS
Basic Materials
VNQ
VIS
Communication Services
VNQ
VIS
Technology
VNQ
VIS
Energy
VNQ
VIS
Financial Services
VNQ
VIS
Industrials
VNQ
VIS
Consumer Cyclical
VNQ
-
VIS
Consumer Defensive
VNQ
-
VIS
-
Healthcare
VNQ
-
VIS
Utilities
VNQ
-
VIS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VNQ vs. VIS — Risk / Return Rank
VNQ
VIS
VNQ vs. VIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VNQ | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.27 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 2.24 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.90 | 9.28 | -4.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VNQ vs. VIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VNQ drawdown since its inception was -73.07%, which is greater than VIS's maximum drawdown of -63.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNQ and VIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VNQ | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.07% | -63.51% | -9.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -12.29% | +3.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.46% | -20.80% | +3.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.48% | -22.96% | -11.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.40% | -42.42% | +0.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.34% | +0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.61% | -8.37% | -5.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 2.97% | -0.32% |
Volatility
VNQ vs. VIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) is 4.72%, while Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that VNQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VNQ | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 6.71% | -1.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.77% | 14.28% | -4.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.54% | 17.20% | -3.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 18.48% | +0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.72% | 20.48% | +0.24% |
VNQ vs. VIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
VNQ has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VIS's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VNQ vs. VIS - Dividend Comparison
VNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, more than VIS's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 0.88% | 1.01% | 1.23% | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 1.90% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 1.94% |
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 3.54% | 3.92% | 3.85% | 3.95% | 3.91% | 2.56% | 3.93% | 3.39% | 4.74% | 4.23% | 4.82% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VNQ and VIS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VIS has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to VNQ (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNQ dropped -73.07% vs VIS's -63.51%.
On 10-year performance, VIS leads with 14.22% vs 5.65% for VNQ. On fees, VIS is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VNQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VIS has performed better with a 14.22% return vs 5.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIS is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for VNQ.
VNQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 0.88% for VIS.
VNQ is categorized as REIT, while VIS is Industrials Equities. VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while VIS tracks MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VNQ and 0.09% for VIS.
VIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VNQ and VIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer