VNQ vs. EIMI.L
VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF) and EIMI.L (iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VNQ is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while EIMI.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VNQ returned 5.65%/yr vs 10.60%/yr for EIMI.L. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VNQ charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EIMI.L.
Performance
VNQ vs. EIMI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VNQ achieves a 12.51% return, which is significantly lower than EIMI.L's 22.83% return. Over the past 10 years, VNQ has underperformed EIMI.L with an annualized return of 5.65%, while EIMI.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.60% annualized return.
VNQ
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- 12.51%
- 6M
- 12.32%
- 1Y
- 12.92%
- 3Y*
- 10.14%
- 5Y*
- 2.55%
- 10Y*
- 5.65%
EIMI.L
- 1D
- 3.53%
- 1M
- 1.15%
- YTD
- 22.83%
- 6M
- 26.10%
- 1Y
- 43.20%
- 3Y*
- 21.64%
- 5Y*
- 7.50%
- 10Y*
- 10.60%
VNQ vs. EIMI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 12.51% | 3.24% | 4.81% | 11.85% | -26.25% | 40.54% | -4.61% | 28.91% | -6.03% | 4.90% |
EIMI.L iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF | 22.83% | 32.16% | 7.36% | 11.03% | -19.67% | -0.65% | 18.80% | 16.37% | -14.18% | 36.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between VNQ and EIMI.L is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2014 | 0.27 |
The correlation between VNQ and EIMI.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VNQ vs. EIMI.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VNQ
EIMI.L
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
Energy
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
VNQ
EIMI.L
Basic Materials
VNQ
EIMI.L
Communication Services
VNQ
EIMI.L
Technology
VNQ
EIMI.L
Energy
VNQ
EIMI.L
Financial Services
VNQ
EIMI.L
Industrials
VNQ
EIMI.L
Consumer Cyclical
VNQ
-
EIMI.L
Consumer Defensive
VNQ
-
EIMI.L
Healthcare
VNQ
-
EIMI.L
Utilities
VNQ
-
EIMI.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VNQ vs. EIMI.L — Risk / Return Rank
VNQ
EIMI.L
VNQ vs. EIMI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VNQ | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.40 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 3.40 | -1.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.90 | 11.76 | -6.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VNQ vs. EIMI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VNQ drawdown since its inception was -73.07%, which is greater than EIMI.L's maximum drawdown of -38.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNQ and EIMI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VNQ | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.07% | -38.73% | -34.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -12.66% | +4.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.46% | -17.44% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.48% | -35.45% | +0.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.40% | -38.73% | -3.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.75% | +3.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.61% | -13.99% | +0.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 3.66% | -1.01% |
Volatility
VNQ vs. EIMI.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) is 4.72%, while iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) has a volatility of 8.37%. This indicates that VNQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIMI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VNQ | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 8.37% | -3.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.77% | 17.62% | -7.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.54% | 19.94% | -6.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 18.46% | +0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.72% | 19.20% | +1.52% |
VNQ vs. EIMI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VNQ has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than EIMI.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VNQ vs. EIMI.L - Dividend Comparison
VNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, while EIMI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIMI.L iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 3.54% | 3.92% | 3.85% | 3.95% | 3.91% | 2.56% | 3.93% | 3.39% | 4.74% | 4.23% | 4.82% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VNQ and EIMI.L have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VNQ is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VNQ is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EIMI.L.
VNQ is categorized as REIT, while EIMI.L is Emerging Markets Equities. VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index, while EIMI.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VNQ and 0.18% for EIMI.L.
Find the right allocation for VNQ and EIMI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer