PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNIE vs. IFLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNIE vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vontobel International Equity Active ETF (VNIE) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNIE achieves a 4.18% return, which is significantly lower than IFLO's 19.10% return.


VNIE

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.56%
6M
2.28%
YTD
4.18%
1Y
-0.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IFLO

1D
0.21%
1M
-0.22%
6M
16.45%
YTD
19.10%
1Y
32.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNIE vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VNIE and IFLO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.69

The correlation between VNIE and IFLO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNIE vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNIE
VNIE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
VNIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNIE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
VNIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNIE Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

IFLO
IFLO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
IFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNIE vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vontobel International Equity Active ETF (VNIE) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VNIEIFLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.39

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.06

4.95

-5.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.18

16.66

-16.83

VNIE vs. IFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNIE Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the IFLO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNIE and IFLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VNIE vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNIE drawdown since its inception was -13.11%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNIE and IFLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNIEIFLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.11%

-6.44%

-6.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.11%

-6.44%

-6.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.34%

-1.58%

-2.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-1.28%

-2.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.10%

1.91%

+3.19%

Volatility

VNIE vs. IFLO - Volatility Comparison

Vontobel International Equity Active ETF (VNIE) has a higher volatility of 6.00% compared to VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO) at 5.00%. This indicates that VNIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNIEIFLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.00%

5.00%

+1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.19%

12.03%

+3.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.65%

14.67%

+1.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.88%

14.62%

+1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.88%

14.62%

+1.26%

VNIE vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNIE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

VNIE vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison

VNIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than IFLO's 1.56% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


VNIE and IFLO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VNIE has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to IFLO (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNIE dropped -13.11% vs IFLO's -6.44%.

On 1-year performance, IFLO leads with 32.35% vs -0.05% for VNIE. On fees, IFLO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, IFLO has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IFLO has performed better with a 32.35% return vs -0.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IFLO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for VNIE.

IFLO has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 0.31% for VNIE.

They also come from different issuers: Vontobel and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for VNIE and 0.56% for IFLO.

IFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNIE and IFLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer