VNIE vs. FDT

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

VNIE (Vontobel International Equity Active ETF) and FDT (First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. VNIE is actively managed, while FDT is passively managed. Over the past year, VNIE returned -0.05% vs 38.06% for FDT. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VNIE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FDT.

Performance

VNIE vs. FDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vontobel International Equity Active ETF (VNIE) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNIE achieves a 4.18% return, which is significantly lower than FDT's 17.66% return.

VNIE

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -0.56%
• 6M: 2.28%
• YTD: 4.18%
• 1Y: -0.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FDT

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: -4.52%
• 6M: 12.50%
• YTD: 17.66%
• 1Y: 38.06%
• 3Y*: 25.60%
• 5Y*: 11.85%
• 10Y*: 10.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNIE vs. FDT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
VNIE Vontobel International Equity Active ETF	4.18%	-1.01%
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund	17.66%	31.47%

Correlation

The correlation between VNIE and FDT is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2025	0.77

The correlation between VNIE and FDT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

VNIE vs. FDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNIE

VNIE Risk / Return Rank: 8
VNIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
VNIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
VNIE Omega Ratio Rank: 8
VNIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
VNIE Martin Ratio Rank: 8

FDT

FDT Risk / Return Rank: 69
FDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
FDT Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FDT Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNIE vs. FDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vontobel International Equity Active ETF (VNIE) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VNIE	FDT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.05	1.84	-1.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.05	2.43	-2.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.34	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.06	2.78	-2.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.18	9.69	-9.86

VNIE vs. FDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNIE Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the FDT Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNIE and FDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VNIE vs. FDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNIE drawdown since its inception was -13.11%, smaller than the maximum FDT drawdown of -46.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNIE and FDT.

Drawdown Indicators

	VNIE	FDT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.11%	-46.10%	+32.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.11%	-13.41%	+0.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.29%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.80%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-46.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.34%	-7.74%	+3.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.19%	-10.74%	+6.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.10%	3.85%	+1.25%

Volatility

VNIE vs. FDT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vontobel International Equity Active ETF (VNIE) is 6.00%, while First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) has a volatility of 7.96%. This indicates that VNIE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VNIE	FDT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.00%	7.96%	-1.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.19%	18.23%	-3.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.65%	20.34%	-3.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.88%	18.57%	-2.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.88%	18.51%	-2.63%

VNIE vs. FDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNIE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FDT's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

VNIE vs. FDT - Dividend Comparison

VNIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than FDT's 2.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund	2.84%	3.27%	3.89%	4.36%	2.29%	3.80%	2.42%	2.78%	2.13%	1.57%	1.76%	1.83%
VNIE Vontobel International Equity Active ETF	0.31%	0.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VNIE and FDT in my portfolio?

VNIE and FDT have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VNIE or FDT?

FDT has higher volatility (7.96%) compared to VNIE (6.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNIE dropped -13.11% vs FDT's -46.10%.

Which ETF is better, VNIE or FDT?

On 1-year performance, FDT leads with 38.06% vs -0.05% for VNIE. On fees, VNIE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, VNIE has been the lower-risk option at 6.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VNIE or FDT?

Over the 1-year period, FDT has performed better with a 38.06% return vs -0.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VNIE or FDT?

VNIE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VNIE or FDT?

FDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 0.31% for VNIE.

What is the main difference between VNIE and FDT?

They also come from different issuers: Vontobel and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for VNIE and 0.80% for FDT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.