PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNCE vs. HUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VNCE vs. HUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vince Holding Corp. (VNCE) and Humana Inc. (HUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNCE achieves a 68.14% return, which is significantly higher than HUM's 40.93% return. Over the past 10 years, VNCE has underperformed HUM with an annualized return of -18.51%, while HUM has yielded a comparatively higher 7.88% annualized return.


VNCE

1D
1.63%
1M
62.95%
YTD
68.14%
6M
55.20%
1Y
411.94%
3Y*
31.02%
5Y*
-7.77%
10Y*
-18.51%

HUM

1D
-0.44%
1M
16.62%
YTD
40.93%
6M
40.86%
1Y
55.46%
3Y*
-5.84%
5Y*
-3.06%
10Y*
7.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNCE vs. HUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VNCE
Vince Holding Corp.
68.14%12.09%5.20%-55.81%-1.69%25.24%-63.26%85.53%50.73%-84.72%
HUM
Humana Inc.
40.93%2.36%-43.96%-9.94%11.15%13.80%12.71%28.94%16.27%22.60%

Correlation

The correlation between VNCE and HUM is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2013

0.10

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VNCE:

$88.13M

HUM:

$43.33B

EPS

VNCE:

$0.70

HUM:

$9.37

PE Ratio

VNCE:

9.83

HUM:

38.34

PS Ratio

VNCE:

0.29

HUM:

0.32

PB Ratio

VNCE:

1.83

HUM:

2.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

VNCE:

$306.11M

HUM:

$137.20B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VNCE:

$152.37M

HUM:

$13.28B

EBITDA (TTM)

VNCE:

$18.52M

HUM:

$2.82B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNCE vs. HUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNCE
VNCE Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
VNCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNCE Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
VNCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNCE Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

HUM
HUM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
HUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUM Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
HUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNCE vs. HUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vince Holding Corp. (VNCE) and Humana Inc. (HUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VNCEHUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.24

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.55

1.18

+6.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.82

2.44

+14.38

VNCE vs. HUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNCE Sharpe Ratio is 3.24, which is higher than the HUM Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNCE and HUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VNCE vs. HUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNCE drawdown since its inception was -99.72%, which is greater than HUM's maximum drawdown of -85.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNCE and HUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNCEHUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.72%

-85.10%

-14.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.98%

-47.18%

-7.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.80%

-67.92%

-6.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.45%

-69.92%

-20.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.46%

-69.92%

-28.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.23%

-33.66%

-64.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-87.18%

-27.16%

-60.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.64%

22.80%

+1.84%

Volatility

VNCE vs. HUM - Volatility Comparison

Vince Holding Corp. (VNCE) has a higher volatility of 35.74% compared to Humana Inc. (HUM) at 11.72%. This indicates that VNCE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNCEHUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

35.74%

11.72%

+24.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

70.85%

38.28%

+32.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

128.41%

49.50%

+78.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

106.91%

37.52%

+69.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

99.02%

34.69%

+64.33%

Dividends

VNCE vs. HUM - Dividend Comparison

VNCE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HUM
Humana Inc.
0.99%1.38%1.40%0.77%0.62%0.60%0.61%0.60%0.70%0.76%0.43%0.64%
VNCE
Vince Holding Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

VNCE vs. HUM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vince Holding Corp. and Humana Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
64.04M
39.65B
(VNCE) Total Revenue
(HUM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

VNCE vs. HUM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Vince Holding Corp. and Humana Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
50.6%
0
Portfolio components
VNCE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vince Holding Corp. reported a gross profit of 32.39M and revenue of 64.04M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.6%.

HUM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Humana Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 39.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

VNCE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vince Holding Corp. reported an operating income of -2.65M and revenue of 64.04M, resulting in an operating margin of -4.1%.

HUM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Humana Inc. reported an operating income of 1.75B and revenue of 39.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.4%.

VNCE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vince Holding Corp. reported a net income of -2.10M and revenue of 64.04M, resulting in a net margin of -3.3%.

HUM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Humana Inc. reported a net income of 1.19B and revenue of 39.65B, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VNCE and HUM have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VNCE has higher volatility (35.74%) compared to HUM (11.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNCE dropped -99.72% vs HUM's -85.10%.

VNCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNCE and HUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer