HUM vs. CI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Humana Inc. (HUM) and Cigna Corporation (CI).

Performance

HUM vs. CI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Humana Inc. (HUM) and Cigna Corporation (CI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HUM vs. CI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HUM Humana Inc.	-31.96%	2.36%	-43.96%	-9.94%	11.15%	13.80%	12.71%	28.94%	16.27%	22.60%
CI Cigna Corporation	-2.55%	1.72%	-6.27%	-7.97%	46.68%	12.29%	1.83%	7.70%	-6.46%	52.29%

Fundamentals

Market Cap HUM : $20.87B CI : $70.94B
EPS HUM : $9.85 CI : $22.28
PE Ratio HUM : 17.60 CI : 11.97
PS Ratio HUM : 0.16 CI : 0.26
PB Ratio HUM : 1.18 CI : 1.70
Total Revenue (TTM) HUM : $129.66B CI : $274.95B
Gross Profit (TTM) HUM : $97.15B CI : $25.99B
EBITDA (TTM) HUM : $2.92B CI : $12.17B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUM achieves a -31.96% return, which is significantly lower than CI's -2.55% return. Over the past 10 years, HUM has underperformed CI with an annualized return of 0.21%, while CI has yielded a comparatively higher 7.90% annualized return.

HUM

• 1D: 4.45%
• 1M: -8.54%
• YTD: -31.96%
• 6M: -32.79%
• 1Y: -33.44%
• 3Y*: -28.19%
• 5Y*: -15.10%
• 10Y*: 0.21%

CI

• 1D: 3.36%
• 1M: -7.45%
• YTD: -2.55%
• 6M: -6.43%
• 1Y: -17.21%
• 3Y*: 3.35%
• 5Y*: 3.84%
• 10Y*: 7.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

HUM vs. CI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUM

HUM Risk / Return Rank: 14
HUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
HUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
HUM Omega Ratio Rank: 15
HUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
HUM Martin Ratio Rank: 11

CI

CI Risk / Return Rank: 20
CI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
CI Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
CI Omega Ratio Rank: 18
CI Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
CI Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUM vs. CI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Humana Inc. (HUM) and Cigna Corporation (CI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HUM	CI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.68	-0.52	-0.16
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.73	-0.49	-0.24
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	0.92	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.71	-0.59	-0.12
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.47	-1.14	-0.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HUM vs. CI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUM Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is comparable to the CI Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUM and CI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HUM	CI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.68	-0.52	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.42	0.14	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.01	0.26	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.34	-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between HUM and CI is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

HUM vs. CI - Dividend Comparison

HUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than CI's 2.28% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HUM Humana Inc.	2.04%	1.38%	1.40%	0.77%	0.62%	0.60%	0.61%	0.60%	0.70%	0.76%	0.43%	0.64%
CI Cigna Corporation	2.28%	2.19%	2.03%	1.64%	1.35%	1.74%	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.03%	0.03%

Drawdowns

HUM vs. CI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUM drawdown since its inception was -85.10%, roughly equal to the maximum CI drawdown of -84.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUM and CI.

Drawdown Indicators

	HUM	CI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.10%	-84.34%	-0.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.18%	-27.41%	-19.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-69.92%	-32.10%	-37.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-69.92%	-42.47%	-27.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-67.97%	-25.07%	-42.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.01%	-18.81%	-8.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.71%	14.19%	+8.52%

Volatility

HUM vs. CI - Volatility Comparison

Humana Inc. (HUM) has a higher volatility of 9.86% compared to Cigna Corporation (CI) at 8.29%. This indicates that HUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HUM	CI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.86%	8.29%	+1.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.38%	27.62%	+10.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.52%	33.11%	+16.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.24%	28.13%	+8.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.07%	30.71%	+3.36%

Financials

HUM vs. CI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Humana Inc. and Cigna Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

HUM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Humana Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 32.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cigna Corporation reported a gross profit of 5.55B and revenue of 72.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.7%.

HUM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Humana Inc. reported an operating income of -808.00M and revenue of 32.52B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.5%.

CI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cigna Corporation reported an operating income of 2.15B and revenue of 72.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.0%.

HUM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Humana Inc. reported a net income of -796.00M and revenue of 32.52B, resulting in a net margin of -2.5%.

CI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cigna Corporation reported a net income of 1.23B and revenue of 72.47B, resulting in a net margin of 1.7%.