HUM vs. CNC

In the year-to-date period, HUM achieves a 4.56% return, which is significantly higher than CNC's -4.77% return. Over the past 10 years, HUM has underperformed CNC with an annualized return of 4.64%, while CNC has yielded a comparatively higher 5.28% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Humana Inc. (HUM) and Centene Corporation (CNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current HUM Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is higher than the CNC Sharpe Ratio of -0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUM and CNC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

HUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, while CNC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum HUM drawdown since its inception was -85.10%, which is greater than CNC's maximum drawdown of -64.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUM and CNC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Humana Inc. (HUM) has a higher volatility of 17.55% compared to Centene Corporation (CNC) at 12.64%. This indicates that HUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Humana Inc. and Centene Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.