HUM vs. CNC
HUM (Humana Inc.) and CNC (Centene Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Healthcare Plans industry within the Healthcare sector. Over the past 10 years, HUM returned 6.48%/yr vs 6.31%/yr for CNC. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HUM vs. CNC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUM achieves a 25.92% return, which is significantly lower than CNC's 45.78% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HUM having a 6.48% annualized return and CNC not far behind at 6.31%.
HUM
- 1D
- -2.26%
- 1M
- 37.35%
- YTD
- 25.92%
- 6M
- 33.75%
- 1Y
- 40.86%
- 3Y*
- -13.88%
- 5Y*
- -4.78%
- 10Y*
- 6.48%
CNC
- 1D
- -3.24%
- 1M
- 12.47%
- YTD
- 45.78%
- 6M
- 54.57%
- 1Y
- 9.25%
- 3Y*
- -3.36%
- 5Y*
- -3.69%
- 10Y*
- 6.31%
HUM vs. CNC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUM Humana Inc. | 25.92% | 2.36% | -43.96% | -9.94% | 11.15% | 13.80% | 12.71% | 28.94% | 16.27% | 22.60% |
CNC Centene Corporation | 45.78% | -32.07% | -18.37% | -9.51% | -0.47% | 37.26% | -4.52% | 9.05% | 14.29% | 78.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUM and CNC is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2001 | 0.46 |
The correlation between HUM and CNC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
HUM:
$38.71B
CNC:
$29.73B
HUM:
$9.37
CNC:
-$13.07
HUM:
0.28
CNC:
0.15
HUM:
2.08
CNC:
1.39
HUM:
$137.20B
CNC:
$198.10B
HUM:
$13.28B
CNC:
$29.57B
HUM:
$2.82B
CNC:
-$5.11B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUM vs. CNC — Risk / Return Rank
HUM
CNC
HUM vs. CNC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Humana Inc. (HUM) and Centene Corporation (CNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HUM | CNC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.84 | 0.14 | +0.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.34 | 0.63 | +0.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.12 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.84 | 0.11 | +0.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.75 | 0.19 | +1.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HUM | CNC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 0.14 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | -0.09 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | 0.16 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.39 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
HUM vs. CNC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUM drawdown since its inception was -85.10%, which is greater than CNC's maximum drawdown of -74.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUM and CNC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUM | CNC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.10% | -74.07% | -11.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.18% | -55.50% | +8.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.92% | -68.65% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.92% | -74.07% | +4.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.92% | -74.07% | +4.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.72% | -38.29% | -2.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.15% | -22.14% | -5.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.79% | 33.84% | -11.05% |
Volatility
HUM vs. CNC - Volatility Comparison
Humana Inc. (HUM) has a higher volatility of 15.20% compared to Centene Corporation (CNC) at 10.37%. This indicates that HUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUM | CNC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.20% | 10.37% | +4.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.83% | 36.27% | +2.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.93% | 64.16% | -15.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.36% | 39.40% | -2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.59% | 38.48% | -3.89% |
Dividends
HUM vs. CNC - Dividend Comparison
HUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, while CNC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNC Centene Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HUM Humana Inc. | 1.10% | 1.38% | 1.40% | 0.77% | 0.62% | 0.60% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.70% | 0.76% | 0.43% | 0.64% |
Financials
HUM vs. CNC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Humana Inc. and Centene Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HUM vs. CNC - Profitability Comparison
HUM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Humana Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 39.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CNC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Centene Corporation reported a gross profit of 10.94B and revenue of 49.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.9%.
HUM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Humana Inc. reported an operating income of 1.75B and revenue of 39.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.4%.
CNC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Centene Corporation reported an operating income of 1.86B and revenue of 49.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.
HUM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Humana Inc. reported a net income of 1.19B and revenue of 39.65B, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.
CNC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Centene Corporation reported a net income of 1.54B and revenue of 49.94B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HUM and CNC have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HUM has higher volatility (15.20%) compared to CNC (10.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUM dropped -85.10% vs CNC's -74.07%.
HUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HUM and CNC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer