PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNCE vs. LMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VNCE vs. LMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vince Holding Corp. (VNCE) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNCE achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly lower than LMT's 7.12% return. Over the past 10 years, VNCE has underperformed LMT with an annualized return of -22.52%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively higher 10.81% annualized return.


VNCE

1D
-4.40%
1M
-16.83%
YTD
6.62%
6M
55.36%
1Y
178.85%
3Y*
-5.65%
5Y*
-18.08%
10Y*
-22.52%

LMT

1D
-0.27%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
7.12%
6M
15.96%
1Y
9.51%
3Y*
6.88%
5Y*
8.25%
10Y*
10.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNCE vs. LMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VNCE
Vince Holding Corp.
6.62%12.09%5.20%-55.81%-1.69%25.24%-63.26%85.53%50.73%-84.72%
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
7.12%2.47%10.02%-4.31%40.48%3.15%-6.49%52.55%-16.35%31.77%

Correlation

The correlation between VNCE and LMT is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2013

0.10

The correlation between VNCE and LMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VNCE:

$56.72M

LMT:

$118.33B

EPS

VNCE:

$0.49

LMT:

$20.61

PE Ratio

VNCE:

8.91

LMT:

24.84

PS Ratio

VNCE:

0.19

LMT:

1.59

PB Ratio

VNCE:

1.13

LMT:

15.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

VNCE:

$300.01M

LMT:

$75.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VNCE:

$149.14M

LMT:

$7.37B

EBITDA (TTM)

VNCE:

$11.48M

LMT:

$8.09B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNCE vs. LMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNCE
VNCE Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VNCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNCE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
VNCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNCE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

LMT
LMT Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
LMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMT Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
LMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMT Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNCE vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vince Holding Corp. (VNCE) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VNCELMTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.46

0.36

+1.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.22

0.64

+2.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.09

+0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

0.38

+2.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.19

0.93

+6.25

VNCE vs. LMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNCE Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the LMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNCE and LMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VNCELMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

0.36

+1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

0.36

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.23

0.46

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.30

0.38

-0.68

Drawdowns

VNCE vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNCE drawdown since its inception was -99.72%, which is greater than LMT's maximum drawdown of -79.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNCE and LMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNCELMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.72%

-79.29%

-20.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.98%

-25.15%

-29.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.82%

-31.79%

-47.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.79%

-31.79%

-60.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.46%

-36.67%

-61.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.88%

-23.84%

-75.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-87.16%

-26.84%

-60.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.02%

10.22%

+14.80%

Volatility

VNCE vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison

Vince Holding Corp. (VNCE) has a higher volatility of 19.58% compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) at 5.45%. This indicates that VNCE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNCELMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.58%

5.45%

+14.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

63.03%

19.56%

+43.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

123.70%

26.54%

+97.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

105.48%

22.89%

+82.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

98.27%

23.71%

+74.56%

Dividends

VNCE vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison

VNCE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
2.67%2.76%2.62%2.68%2.34%2.98%2.76%2.31%3.13%2.32%2.71%2.83%
VNCE
Vince Holding Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

VNCE vs. LMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vince Holding Corp. and Lockheed Martin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
83.71M
18.02B
(VNCE) Total Revenue
(LMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

VNCE vs. LMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Vince Holding Corp. and Lockheed Martin Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
49.1%
11.5%
Portfolio components
VNCE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vince Holding Corp. reported a gross profit of 41.14M and revenue of 83.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.1%.

LMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.08B and revenue of 18.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.

VNCE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vince Holding Corp. reported an operating income of -2.91M and revenue of 83.71M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.5%.

LMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported an operating income of 2.06B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

VNCE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vince Holding Corp. reported a net income of -3.61M and revenue of 83.71M, resulting in a net margin of -4.3%.

LMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a net income of 1.49B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VNCE and LMT have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VNCE has higher volatility (19.58%) compared to LMT (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNCE dropped -99.72% vs LMT's -79.29%.

VNCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNCE and LMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer