PortfoliosLab logo
HUM vs. ENSG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between HUM and ENSG is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

HUM vs. ENSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Humana Inc. (HUM) and The Ensign Group, Inc. (ENSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HUM:

-0.59

ENSG:

0.64

Sortino Ratio

HUM:

-0.52

ENSG:

0.98

Omega Ratio

HUM:

0.93

ENSG:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

HUM:

-0.38

ENSG:

0.69

Martin Ratio

HUM:

-0.83

ENSG:

1.51

Ulcer Index

HUM:

26.84%

ENSG:

10.65%

Daily Std Dev

HUM:

41.68%

ENSG:

25.94%

Max Drawdown

HUM:

-85.10%

ENSG:

-55.56%

Current Drawdown

HUM:

-54.62%

ENSG:

-12.81%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HUM:

$30.12B

ENSG:

$7.86B

EPS

HUM:

$14.17

ENSG:

$5.30

PE Ratio

HUM:

17.61

ENSG:

25.79

PEG Ratio

HUM:

0.77

ENSG:

1.45

PS Ratio

HUM:

0.25

ENSG:

1.78

PB Ratio

HUM:

1.72

ENSG:

4.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

HUM:

$120.26B

ENSG:

$4.42B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HUM:

$120.26B

ENSG:

$676.18M

EBITDA (TTM)

HUM:

$4.12B

ENSG:

$495.95M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUM achieves a -1.32% return, which is significantly lower than ENSG's 2.93% return. Over the past 10 years, HUM has underperformed ENSG with an annualized return of 4.45%, while ENSG has yielded a comparatively higher 21.39% annualized return.


HUM

YTD

-1.32%

1M

-15.43%

6M

-12.81%

1Y

-24.75%

5Y*

-7.54%

10Y*

4.45%

ENSG

YTD

2.93%

1M

6.81%

6M

-7.65%

1Y

15.71%

5Y*

29.40%

10Y*

21.39%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HUM vs. ENSG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HUM is 2323
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HUM is 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HUM is 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HUM is 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HUM is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HUM is 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

ENSG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ENSG is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ENSG is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ENSG is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ENSG is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ENSG is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ENSG is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HUM vs. ENSG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Humana Inc. (HUM) and The Ensign Group, Inc. (ENSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current HUM Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the ENSG Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUM and ENSG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

HUM vs. ENSG - Dividend Comparison

HUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than ENSG's 0.18% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
HUM
Humana Inc.
1.42%1.40%0.77%0.62%0.60%0.61%0.60%0.70%0.76%0.43%0.64%0.77%
ENSG
The Ensign Group, Inc.
0.18%0.18%0.21%0.24%0.25%0.28%0.40%0.47%0.78%0.73%0.97%0.57%

Drawdowns

HUM vs. ENSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUM drawdown since its inception was -85.10%, which is greater than ENSG's maximum drawdown of -55.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUM and ENSG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

HUM vs. ENSG - Volatility Comparison

Humana Inc. (HUM) has a higher volatility of 13.47% compared to The Ensign Group, Inc. (ENSG) at 8.82%. This indicates that HUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

HUM vs. ENSG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Humana Inc. and The Ensign Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20212022202320242025
32.11B
1.17B
(HUM) Total Revenue
(ENSG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HUM vs. ENSG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Humana Inc. and The Ensign Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
16.0%
(HUM) Gross Margin
(ENSG) Gross Margin
HUM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Humana Inc. reported a gross profit of 32.11B and revenue of 32.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

ENSG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Ensign Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 188.12M and revenue of 1.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.0%.

HUM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Humana Inc. reported an operating income of 2.01B and revenue of 32.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.3%.

ENSG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Ensign Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 101.37M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.6%.

HUM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Humana Inc. reported a net income of 1.24B and revenue of 32.11B, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.

ENSG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Ensign Group, Inc. reported a net income of 80.28M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.