PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VNAM vs. DBEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VNAM vs. DBEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VNAM achieves a -2.39% return, which is significantly lower than DBEM's 32.18% return.


VNAM

1D
-0.41%
1M
-5.03%
YTD
-2.39%
6M
1.38%
1Y
42.45%
3Y*
16.20%
5Y*
10Y*

DBEM

1D
-0.69%
1M
10.58%
YTD
32.18%
6M
34.98%
1Y
64.04%
3Y*
25.82%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
10.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VNAM vs. DBEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VNAM
Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF
-2.39%67.05%-7.78%12.95%-44.16%2.41%
DBEM
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF
32.18%30.42%10.61%10.53%-17.00%-1.08%

Correlation

The correlation between VNAM and DBEM is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2021

0.29

The correlation between VNAM and DBEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VNAM vs. DBEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VNAM
DBEM

Real Estate

38.6%
1.1%

Financial Services

25.5%
19.6%

Industrials

12.8%
7.6%

Basic Materials

9.0%
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.9%
3.0%

Technology

4.7%
36.4%

Energy

1.9%
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

0.9%
9.6%

Utilities

0.7%
2.1%

Communication Services

-

7.0%

Healthcare

-

2.9%

Real Estate

VNAM
38.6%
DBEM
1.1%

Financial Services

VNAM
25.5%
DBEM
19.6%

Industrials

VNAM
12.8%
DBEM
7.6%

Basic Materials

VNAM
9.0%
DBEM
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

VNAM
5.9%
DBEM
3.0%

Technology

VNAM
4.7%
DBEM
36.4%

Energy

VNAM
1.9%
DBEM
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VNAM
0.9%
DBEM
9.6%

Utilities

VNAM
0.7%
DBEM
2.1%

Communication Services

VNAM

-

DBEM
7.0%

Healthcare

VNAM

-

DBEM
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VNAM vs. DBEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VNAM
VNAM Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
VNAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNAM Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
VNAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNAM Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

DBEM
DBEM Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
DBEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBEM Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
DBEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBEM Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VNAM vs. DBEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VNAMDBEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.64

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

6.13

-3.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.34

24.38

-17.04

VNAM vs. DBEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VNAM Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the DBEM Sharpe Ratio of 3.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VNAM and DBEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VNAMDBEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

3.58

-1.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

0.34

-0.36

Drawdowns

VNAM vs. DBEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VNAM drawdown since its inception was -52.84%, which is greater than DBEM's maximum drawdown of -33.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VNAM and DBEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNAMDBEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.84%

-33.51%

-19.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.03%

-10.51%

-6.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.34%

-15.12%

-16.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.01%

-0.69%

-8.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.54%

-11.69%

-18.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.81%

2.63%

+3.18%

Volatility

VNAM vs. DBEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM) is 6.74%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) has a volatility of 7.53%. This indicates that VNAM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNAMDBEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.74%

7.53%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.91%

15.53%

+4.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.85%

17.96%

+8.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.60%

17.08%

+8.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.60%

17.14%

+8.46%

VNAM vs. DBEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VNAM has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than DBEM's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

VNAM vs. DBEM - Dividend Comparison

VNAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than DBEM's 1.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBEM
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF
1.39%1.84%2.48%2.55%2.65%1.77%1.74%2.59%2.85%1.51%1.59%3.49%
VNAM
Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF
0.51%0.50%1.00%0.49%1.04%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VNAM and DBEM have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBEM has higher volatility (7.53%) compared to VNAM (6.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VNAM dropped -52.84% vs DBEM's -33.51%.

On 3-year performance, DBEM leads with 25.82% vs 16.20% for VNAM. On fees, VNAM is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, VNAM has been the lower-risk option at 6.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DBEM has performed better with a 25.82% return vs 16.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VNAM is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for DBEM.

DBEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.51% for VNAM.

VNAM tracks MSCI Vietnam Select 25/50 Index, while DBEM tracks MSCI EM US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for VNAM and 0.66% for DBEM.

DBEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.58 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VNAM and DBEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer