VMOT vs. XSVM

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

VMOT (Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF) and XSVM (Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - VMOT tracks the Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend Index while XSVM tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VMOT returned 6.32%/yr vs 10.26%/yr for XSVM. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. VMOT charges 1.75%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for XSVM.

Performance

VMOT vs. XSVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMOT achieves a 13.93% return, which is significantly lower than XSVM's 27.31% return.

VMOT

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 0.02%
• 6M: 6.39%
• YTD: 13.93%
• 1Y: 28.99%
• 3Y*: 16.72%
• 5Y*: 6.32%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.81%

XSVM

• 1D: 1.19%
• 1M: 3.59%
• 6M: 17.18%
• YTD: 27.31%
• 1Y: 43.31%
• 3Y*: 15.08%
• 5Y*: 10.26%
• 10Y*: 13.04%
• ALL TIME*: 9.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
VMOT Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF	$66.38K	$54.09K	$71.17K
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF	$2.64M	$2.37M	$2.08M

VMOT vs. XSVM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VMOT Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF	13.93%	18.54%	12.07%	-0.74%	-7.00%	3.52%	4.69%	4.59%	-15.64%	14.98%
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF	27.31%	7.47%	2.30%	20.20%	-13.63%	56.36%	5.08%	30.01%	-12.33%	6.61%

Correlation

The correlation between VMOT and XSVM is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2017	0.61

The correlation between VMOT and XSVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.70 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VMOT vs. XSVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VMOT	XSVM
Industrials	19.9%	5.3%
Consumer Cyclical	18.8%	18.1%
Technology	11.4%	2.6%
Energy	8.6%	5.7%
Consumer Defensive	8.5%	4.1%
Healthcare	8.4%	1.7%
Financial Services	8.1%	45.1%
Communication Services	7.3%	2.6%
Basic Materials	5.1%	3.0%
Utilities	3.3%	2.1%
Real Estate	0.6%	9.7%

Return for Risk

VMOT vs. XSVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VMOT

VMOT Risk / Return Rank: 75
VMOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
VMOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
VMOT Omega Ratio Rank: 76
VMOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
VMOT Martin Ratio Rank: 76

XSVM

XSVM Risk / Return Rank: 91
XSVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
XSVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
XSVM Omega Ratio Rank: 90
XSVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
XSVM Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VMOT vs. XSVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VMOT	XSVM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	2.45	-0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	3.53	-0.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.43	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	4.32	-1.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.01	13.79	-3.78

VMOT vs. XSVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMOT Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the XSVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMOT and XSVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VMOT vs. XSVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMOT drawdown since its inception was -34.71%, smaller than the maximum XSVM drawdown of -62.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMOT and XSVM.

Drawdown Indicators

	VMOT	XSVM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.71%	-62.57%	+27.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.85%	-10.08%	-0.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.23%	-26.21%	+5.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.73%	-26.21%	+2.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-49.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.40%	-0.28%	-3.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.13%	-11.48%	-1.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.90%	3.15%	-0.25%

Volatility

VMOT vs. XSVM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) is 4.03%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that VMOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VMOT	XSVM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.03%	4.25%	-0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.85%	11.78%	+2.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.17%	17.83%	-1.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.74%	22.34%	-6.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.93%	25.01%	-10.08%

VMOT vs. XSVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMOT has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XSVM's 0.37% expense ratio.

Dividends

VMOT vs. XSVM - Dividend Comparison

VMOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than XSVM's 1.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VMOT Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF	1.80%	2.05%	2.54%	4.13%	2.24%	0.82%	0.00%	1.76%	0.93%	0.81%	0.00%	0.00%
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF	1.73%	2.29%	1.69%	1.31%	1.79%	1.23%	1.21%	1.22%	2.54%	1.90%	2.29%	2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VMOT and XSVM in my portfolio?

VMOT and XSVM have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VMOT or XSVM?

XSVM has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to VMOT (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMOT dropped -34.71% vs XSVM's -62.57%.

Which ETF is better, VMOT or XSVM?

On 5-year performance, XSVM leads with 10.26% vs 6.32% for VMOT. On fees, XSVM is cheaper at 0.37% per year. On volatility, VMOT has been the lower-risk option at 4.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VMOT or XSVM?

Over the 5-year period, XSVM has performed better with a 10.26% return vs 6.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VMOT or XSVM?

XSVM is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for VMOT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VMOT or XSVM?

VMOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 1.73% for XSVM.

What is the main difference between VMOT and XSVM?

VMOT tracks Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend Index, while XSVM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.75% for VMOT and 0.37% for XSVM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XSVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.