PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMOT vs. USVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMOT vs. USVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMOT achieves a 13.93% return, which is significantly lower than USVM's 22.48% return.


VMOT

1D
0.25%
1M
0.02%
6M
6.39%
YTD
13.93%
1Y
28.99%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
6.32%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.81%

USVM

1D
1.15%
1M
1.97%
6M
15.40%
YTD
22.48%
1Y
37.25%
3Y*
19.23%
5Y*
11.56%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.36M$4.66M$4.71M
$66.38K$54.09K$71.17K

VMOT vs. USVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMOT
Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF
13.93%18.54%12.07%-0.74%-7.00%3.52%4.69%4.59%-15.64%5.39%
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
22.48%10.56%16.59%18.90%-13.23%24.44%11.56%21.65%-9.39%2.06%

Correlation

The correlation between VMOT and USVM is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017

0.72

The correlation between VMOT and USVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (5 years) to 0.81 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VMOT vs. USVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VMOT
USVM

Industrials

19.9%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

18.8%
12.3%

Technology

11.4%
9.6%

Energy

8.6%
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

8.5%
3.6%

Healthcare

8.4%
12.6%

Financial Services

8.1%
24.6%

Communication Services

7.3%
3.0%

Basic Materials

5.1%
1.7%

Utilities

3.3%
7.3%

Real Estate

0.6%
9.4%

Industrials

VMOT
19.9%
USVM
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VMOT
18.8%
USVM
12.3%

Technology

VMOT
11.4%
USVM
9.6%

Energy

VMOT
8.6%
USVM
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

VMOT
8.5%
USVM
3.6%

Healthcare

VMOT
8.4%
USVM
12.6%

Financial Services

VMOT
8.1%
USVM
24.6%

Communication Services

VMOT
7.3%
USVM
3.0%

Basic Materials

VMOT
5.1%
USVM
1.7%

Utilities

VMOT
3.3%
USVM
7.3%

Real Estate

VMOT
0.6%
USVM
9.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMOT vs. USVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VMOT
VMOT Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VMOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMOT Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VMOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

USVM
USVM Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
USVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
USVM Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
USVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
USVM Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VMOT vs. USVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VMOTUSVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.45

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

4.48

-1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.01

17.35

-7.34

VMOT vs. USVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMOT Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the USVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMOT and USVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VMOT vs. USVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMOT drawdown since its inception was -34.71%, smaller than the maximum USVM drawdown of -42.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMOT and USVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMOTUSVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.71%

-42.38%

+7.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.85%

-8.36%

-2.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.23%

-24.34%

+4.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.73%

-25.27%

+1.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.40%

0.00%

-3.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.13%

-7.76%

-5.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

2.15%

+0.75%

Volatility

VMOT vs. USVM - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) at 3.07%. This indicates that VMOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMOTUSVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

3.07%

+0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.85%

10.70%

+3.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.17%

14.59%

+1.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.74%

19.46%

-3.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.93%

21.86%

-6.93%

VMOT vs. USVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMOT has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than USVM's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

VMOT vs. USVM - Dividend Comparison

VMOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, which matches USVM's 1.80% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
1.80%1.84%1.75%1.63%1.43%0.70%1.21%1.77%1.43%0.65%
VMOT
Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF
1.80%2.05%2.54%4.13%2.24%0.82%0.00%1.76%0.93%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMOT and USVM have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VMOT has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to USVM (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMOT dropped -34.71% vs USVM's -42.38%.

On 5-year performance, USVM leads with 11.56% vs 6.32% for VMOT. On fees, USVM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, USVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USVM has performed better with a 11.56% return vs 6.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USVM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for VMOT.

VMOT and USVM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.80%.

VMOT tracks Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend Index, while USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Victory. Their fees differ too: 1.75% for VMOT and 0.29% for USVM.

USVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMOT and USVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer