VMOT vs. SMOM
VMOT (Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF) and SMOM (Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VMOT is a Momentum fund tracking the Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend Index, while SMOM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Symmetry Partners. VMOT is passively managed, while SMOM is actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VMOT charges 1.75%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for SMOM.
Performance
VMOT vs. SMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMOT achieves a 17.28% return, which is significantly higher than SMOM's 9.82% return.
VMOT
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 3.80%
- YTD
- 17.28%
- 6M
- 20.07%
- 1Y
- 34.59%
- 3Y*
- 19.57%
- 5Y*
- 6.94%
- 10Y*
- —
SMOM
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 5.93%
- YTD
- 9.82%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VMOT vs. SMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VMOT Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF | 17.28% | 6.06% |
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 9.82% | 2.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between VMOT and SMOM is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VMOT vs. SMOM — Risk / Return Rank
VMOT
SMOM
VMOT vs. SMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF (VMOT) and Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VMOT | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.42 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VMOT | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 1.45 | -1.10 |
Drawdowns
VMOT vs. SMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMOT drawdown since its inception was -34.71%, which is greater than SMOM's maximum drawdown of -7.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMOT and SMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VMOT | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.71% | -7.45% | -27.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | 0.00% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.32% | -1.48% | -11.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | — | — |
Volatility
VMOT vs. SMOM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VMOT | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.87% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.26% | 12.62% | +2.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.68% | 12.62% | +3.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.90% | 12.62% | +2.28% |
VMOT vs. SMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMOT has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SMOM's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
VMOT vs. SMOM - Dividend Comparison
VMOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than SMOM's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VMOT Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF | 1.75% | 2.05% | 2.54% | 4.13% | 2.24% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 1.76% | 0.93% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VMOT and SMOM have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMOM is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMOM is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for VMOT.
VMOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.15% for SMOM.
VMOT is categorized as Momentum, while SMOM is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Symmetry Partners. Their fees differ too: 1.75% for VMOT and 0.63% for SMOM.
Find the right allocation for VMOT and SMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer