PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMFVX vs. FASOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMFVX vs. FASOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I (FASOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMFVX achieves a 10.96% return, which is significantly lower than FASOX's 24.07% return. Over the past 10 years, VMFVX has underperformed FASOX with an annualized return of 10.69%, while FASOX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.41% annualized return.


VMFVX

1D
0.89%
1M
3.13%
YTD
10.96%
6M
8.89%
1Y
22.11%
3Y*
13.31%
5Y*
9.31%
10Y*
10.69%

FASOX

1D
1.24%
1M
4.44%
YTD
24.07%
6M
22.37%
1Y
41.69%
3Y*
14.40%
5Y*
10.21%
10Y*
11.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMFVX vs. FASOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMFVX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
10.96%7.57%10.59%16.49%-7.03%30.54%3.68%26.18%-11.90%12.27%
FASOX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I
24.07%8.28%-2.00%20.51%-7.38%33.31%8.21%34.49%-16.90%17.40%

Correlation

The correlation between VMFVX and FASOX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011

0.95

The correlation between VMFVX and FASOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMFVX vs. FASOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMFVX
VMFVX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
VMFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
VMFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

FASOX
FASOX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FASOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASOX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FASOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASOX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMFVX vs. FASOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I (FASOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VMFVXFASOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.41

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

4.36

-2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.36

16.03

-8.67

VMFVX vs. FASOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMFVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the FASOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMFVX and FASOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VMFVX vs. FASOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMFVX drawdown since its inception was -45.79%, smaller than the maximum FASOX drawdown of -69.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMFVX and FASOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMFVXFASOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.79%

-69.86%

+24.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.52%

-9.79%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.46%

-34.34%

+11.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.46%

-34.34%

+11.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.79%

-47.97%

+2.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-0.47%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.47%

-9.69%

+4.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

2.65%

+0.39%

Volatility

VMFVX vs. FASOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) is 4.23%, while Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I (FASOX) has a volatility of 5.20%. This indicates that VMFVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMFVXFASOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

5.20%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.68%

12.30%

-1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.25%

17.32%

-2.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.45%

20.70%

-1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.89%

22.03%

-0.14%

VMFVX vs. FASOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMFVX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FASOX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

VMFVX vs. FASOX - Dividend Comparison

VMFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than FASOX's 7.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FASOX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I
7.28%9.03%0.00%2.74%2.34%7.97%0.91%5.21%15.65%7.00%20.89%1.24%
VMFVX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.70%1.88%1.81%1.58%2.04%1.81%2.48%1.94%2.01%1.56%1.42%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, VMFVX and FASOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FASOX has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to VMFVX (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMFVX dropped -45.79% vs FASOX's -69.86%.

FASOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMFVX and FASOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer