VMFVX vs. VB
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB).
VMFVX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Nov 2, 2010. VB is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Small Cap. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VMFVX or VB.
Correlation
The correlation between VMFVX and VB is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VMFVX vs. VB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
VMFVX:
1.21
VB:
1.11
VMFVX:
1.78
VB:
1.61
VMFVX:
1.22
VB:
1.20
VMFVX:
2.18
VB:
2.11
VMFVX:
5.35
VB:
4.85
VMFVX:
3.51%
VB:
3.76%
VMFVX:
15.50%
VB:
16.39%
VMFVX:
-45.78%
VB:
-59.57%
VMFVX:
-4.12%
VB:
-4.16%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMFVX achieves a 3.41% return, which is significantly lower than VB's 3.95% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VMFVX having a 9.12% annualized return and VB not far ahead at 9.14%.
VMFVX
3.41%
-0.05%
9.59%
17.70%
10.86%
9.12%
VB
3.95%
0.50%
10.96%
17.11%
9.56%
9.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VMFVX vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMFVX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VMFVX vs. VB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
VMFVX
VB
VMFVX vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VMFVX vs. VB - Dividend Comparison
VMFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than VB's 1.25% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMFVX Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares | 1.75% | 1.81% | 1.60% | 2.04% | 1.81% | 2.48% | 1.97% | 2.01% | 1.56% | 1.42% | 1.73% | 1.57% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.25% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% | 1.43% |
Drawdowns
VMFVX vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMFVX drawdown since its inception was -45.78%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMFVX and VB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VMFVX vs. VB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFVX) is 3.60%, while Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) has a volatility of 3.79%. This indicates that VMFVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.