VMBS vs. MTBA
VMBS (Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF) and MTBA (Simplify MBS ETF) are both Mortgage Backed Securities funds. VMBS is passively managed, while MTBA is actively managed. Over the past year, VMBS returned 6.25% vs 4.76% for MTBA. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VMBS charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTBA.
Performance
VMBS vs. MTBA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMBS achieves a 0.70% return, which is significantly higher than MTBA's -0.13% return.
VMBS
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 6.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- 0.49%
- 10Y*
- 1.36%
MTBA
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- 4.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VMBS vs. MTBA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VMBS Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 0.70% | 8.36% | 1.70% | 6.48% |
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF | -0.13% | 7.74% | 1.99% | 3.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between VMBS and MTBA is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2023 | 0.90 |
The correlation between VMBS and MTBA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VMBS vs. MTBA — Risk / Return Rank
VMBS
MTBA
VMBS vs. MTBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (VMBS) and Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VMBS | MTBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.30 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 1.69 | +0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.83 | 5.74 | +2.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VMBS | MTBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 1.56 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 1.31 | -0.85 |
Drawdowns
VMBS vs. MTBA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMBS drawdown since its inception was -17.47%, which is greater than MTBA's maximum drawdown of -3.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMBS and MTBA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VMBS | MTBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.47% | -3.48% | -13.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.68% | -2.82% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.29% | -1.50% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.49% | -0.79% | -1.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.80% | 0.83% | -0.03% |
Volatility
VMBS vs. MTBA - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (VMBS) has a higher volatility of 1.61% compared to Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) at 1.33%. This indicates that VMBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VMBS | MTBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.61% | 1.33% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.16% | 2.47% | +0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.37% | 3.10% | +1.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.77% | 3.95% | +2.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.40% | 3.95% | +1.45% |
VMBS vs. MTBA - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMBS has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than MTBA's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VMBS vs. MTBA - Dividend Comparison
VMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, less than MTBA's 6.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF | 6.08% | 5.98% | 6.03% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VMBS Vanguard Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 4.18% | 4.20% | 3.94% | 3.31% | 2.35% | 1.02% | 2.01% | 2.77% | 2.72% | 2.16% | 2.10% | 2.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VMBS and MTBA have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VMBS has higher volatility (1.61%) compared to MTBA (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMBS dropped -17.47% vs MTBA's -3.48%.
On 1-year performance, VMBS leads with 6.25% vs 4.76% for MTBA. On fees, VMBS is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, MTBA has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VMBS has performed better with a 6.25% return vs 4.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VMBS is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MTBA.
MTBA has the higher dividend yield at 6.08%, compared with 4.18% for VMBS.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VMBS and 0.15% for MTBA.
MTBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VMBS and MTBA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer