VMAX vs. FDL
VMAX (Hartford US Value ETF) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. VMAX is actively managed, while FDL is passively managed. Over the past year, VMAX returned 27.28% vs 23.67% for FDL. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VMAX charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FDL.
Performance
VMAX vs. FDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMAX achieves a 12.22% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 13.33% return.
VMAX
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 2.11%
- YTD
- 12.22%
- 6M
- 13.50%
- 1Y
- 27.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDL
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- 13.33%
- 6M
- 14.76%
- 1Y
- 23.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.97%
- 5Y*
- 12.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.24%
VMAX vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VMAX Hartford US Value ETF | 12.22% | 15.65% | 15.89% | 6.98% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 13.33% | 14.79% | 17.98% | 4.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between VMAX and FDL is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2023 | 0.70 |
The correlation between VMAX and FDL shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VMAX vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VMAX
FDL
Financial Services
Energy
Healthcare
Technology
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Financial Services
VMAX
FDL
Energy
VMAX
FDL
Healthcare
VMAX
FDL
Technology
VMAX
FDL
Communication Services
VMAX
FDL
Utilities
VMAX
FDL
Industrials
VMAX
FDL
Real Estate
VMAX
FDL
-
Consumer Defensive
VMAX
FDL
Consumer Cyclical
VMAX
FDL
Basic Materials
VMAX
FDL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VMAX vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank
VMAX
FDL
VMAX vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VMAX | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.37 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.56 | 5.56 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.55 | 13.56 | +5.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VMAX | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 2.11 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.37 | 0.45 | +0.92 |
Drawdowns
VMAX vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMAX drawdown since its inception was -19.05%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMAX and FDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VMAX | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.05% | -65.93% | +46.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.93% | -4.27% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -2.18% | +1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.57% | -9.66% | +7.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.40% | 1.75% | -0.35% |
Volatility
VMAX vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX) is 2.55%, while First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a volatility of 2.85%. This indicates that VMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VMAX | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.55% | 2.85% | -0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.71% | 7.87% | +0.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.22% | 11.28% | +0.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.45% | 14.31% | +1.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.45% | 17.11% | -1.66% |
VMAX vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMAX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
VMAX vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison
VMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than FDL's 3.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 3.68% | 4.04% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 3.97% | 3.18% | 2.93% | 3.65% |
VMAX Hartford US Value ETF | 1.91% | 2.14% | 1.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VMAX and FDL have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDL has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to VMAX (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMAX dropped -19.05% vs FDL's -65.93%.
On 1-year performance, VMAX leads with 27.28% vs 23.67% for FDL. On fees, VMAX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, VMAX has been the lower-risk option at 2.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VMAX has performed better with a 27.28% return vs 23.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VMAX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDL.
FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 1.91% for VMAX.
They also come from different issuers: Hartford and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for VMAX and 0.45% for FDL.
VMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VMAX and FDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer