VLT vs. NHS

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

VLT (Invesco High Income Trust II) is a stock, while NHS (Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund) is High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Neuberger Berman. Over the past 10 years, VLT returned 6.49%/yr vs 5.45%/yr for NHS. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

VLT vs. NHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco High Income Trust II (VLT) and Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund (NHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLT achieves a -2.19% return, which is significantly higher than NHS's -9.78% return. Over the past 10 years, VLT has outperformed NHS with an annualized return of 6.49%, while NHS has yielded a comparatively lower 5.45% annualized return.

VLT

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.12%
• YTD: -2.19%
• 6M: -0.77%
• 1Y: 7.44%
• 3Y*: 11.28%
• 5Y*: 3.62%
• 10Y*: 6.49%

NHS

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: -0.33%
• YTD: -9.78%
• 6M: -5.59%
• 1Y: -4.59%
• 3Y*: 7.73%
• 5Y*: -1.61%
• 10Y*: 5.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLT vs. NHS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VLT Invesco High Income Trust II	-2.19%	13.22%	17.38%	13.12%	-20.82%	14.53%	4.46%	23.60%	-7.97%	10.68%
NHS Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund	-9.78%	14.81%	11.04%	6.12%	-22.99%	15.78%	4.57%	39.03%	-11.45%	8.64%

Correlation

The correlation between VLT and NHS is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2003	0.39

The correlation between VLT and NHS shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

VLT vs. NHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLT

VLT Risk / Return Rank: 65
VLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
VLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
VLT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
VLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
VLT Martin Ratio Rank: 65

NHS

NHS Risk / Return Rank: 1
NHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
NHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NHS Omega Ratio Rank: 1
NHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
NHS Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLT vs. NHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco High Income Trust II (VLT) and Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund (NHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VLT	NHS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	-0.35	+1.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	-0.39	+1.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	0.95	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.74	-0.26	+1.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.55	-0.60	+3.15

VLT vs. NHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the NHS Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLT and NHS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VLT vs. NHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLT drawdown since its inception was -75.78%, which is greater than NHS's maximum drawdown of -64.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLT and NHS.

Drawdown Indicators

	VLT	NHS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.78%	-64.67%	-11.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.55%	-17.01%	+6.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.41%	-17.01%	+3.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.46%	-37.43%	+6.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.02%	-42.97%	+0.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.40%	-15.22%	+11.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.93%	-8.87%	-8.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.04%	7.42%	-4.38%

Volatility

VLT vs. NHS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco High Income Trust II (VLT) and Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund (NHS) have volatilities of 3.21% and 3.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VLT	NHS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.21%	3.14%	+0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.72%	10.10%	-3.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.14%	12.93%	-4.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.67%	16.16%	-4.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.93%	16.71%	-2.78%

Dividends

VLT vs. NHS - Dividend Comparison

VLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.83%, less than NHS's 17.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NHS Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund	17.54%	14.60%	14.50%	13.94%	12.75%	8.74%	9.29%	7.99%	8.37%	7.59%	8.23%	9.81%
VLT Invesco High Income Trust II	10.83%	10.27%	10.55%	11.13%	11.27%	8.06%	8.51%	8.10%	8.44%	7.00%	8.06%	9.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VLT and NHS in my portfolio?

VLT and NHS have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VLT or NHS?

VLT has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to NHS (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLT dropped -75.78% vs NHS's -64.67%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.