PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
VLT vs. VPV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


VLTVPV
YTD Return19.26%15.67%
1Y Return28.17%26.87%
3Y Return (Ann)1.40%-2.01%
5Y Return (Ann)5.26%1.08%
10Y Return (Ann)5.93%2.96%
Sharpe Ratio3.192.87
Sortino Ratio4.454.51
Omega Ratio1.631.66
Calmar Ratio1.460.94
Martin Ratio25.5819.96
Ulcer Index1.09%1.35%
Daily Std Dev8.73%9.36%
Max Drawdown-69.60%-45.33%
Current Drawdown-1.41%-9.58%

Fundamentals


VLTVPV
Market Cap$74.08M$264.03M
EPS$1.36$0.94
PE Ratio8.3811.79
PEG Ratio0.000.00
Total Revenue (TTM)$7.49M$14.97M
Gross Profit (TTM)$6.56M$12.29M
EBITDA (TTM)$6.47M$18.24M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between VLT and VPV is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

VLT vs. VPV - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, VLT achieves a 19.26% return, which is significantly higher than VPV's 15.67% return. Over the past 10 years, VLT has outperformed VPV with an annualized return of 5.93%, while VPV has yielded a comparatively lower 2.96% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
11.84%
11.56%
VLT
VPV

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

VLT vs. VPV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco High Income Trust II (VLT) and Invesco Pennsylvania Value Municipal Income Trust (VPV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VLT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VLT, currently valued at 3.19, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.19
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VLT, currently valued at 4.45, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.45
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VLT, currently valued at 1.63, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.63
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VLT, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.46
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VLT, currently valued at 25.58, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0025.58
VPV
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VPV, currently valued at 2.87, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.87
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VPV, currently valued at 4.51, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.004.51
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VPV, currently valued at 1.66, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.66
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VPV, currently valued at 0.94, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.94
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VPV, currently valued at 19.96, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0019.96

VLT vs. VPV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLT Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is comparable to the VPV Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLT and VPV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.003.504.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.19
2.87
VLT
VPV

Dividends

VLT vs. VPV - Dividend Comparison

VLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.17%, more than VPV's 4.99% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
VLT
Invesco High Income Trust II
10.17%11.09%11.23%8.02%8.48%8.07%8.43%7.00%8.08%9.74%8.69%8.62%
VPV
Invesco Pennsylvania Value Municipal Income Trust
4.99%3.86%5.51%4.29%4.59%4.85%5.94%5.14%6.00%6.09%6.48%7.41%

Drawdowns

VLT vs. VPV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLT drawdown since its inception was -69.60%, which is greater than VPV's maximum drawdown of -45.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLT and VPV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.41%
-9.58%
VLT
VPV

Volatility

VLT vs. VPV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco High Income Trust II (VLT) is 1.93%, while Invesco Pennsylvania Value Municipal Income Trust (VPV) has a volatility of 2.55%. This indicates that VLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VPV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.93%
2.55%
VLT
VPV

Financials

VLT vs. VPV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Invesco High Income Trust II and Invesco Pennsylvania Value Municipal Income Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items