PortfoliosLab logo
VLT vs. VPV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between VLT and VPV is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

VLT vs. VPV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco High Income Trust II (VLT) and Invesco Pennsylvania Value Municipal Income Trust (VPV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

VLT:

0.76

VPV:

0.37

Sortino Ratio

VLT:

1.00

VPV:

0.62

Omega Ratio

VLT:

1.17

VPV:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

VLT:

0.66

VPV:

0.23

Martin Ratio

VLT:

2.90

VPV:

0.80

Ulcer Index

VLT:

3.04%

VPV:

5.57%

Daily Std Dev

VLT:

11.78%

VPV:

11.08%

Max Drawdown

VLT:

-69.60%

VPV:

-45.33%

Current Drawdown

VLT:

-3.94%

VPV:

-15.64%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VLT:

$68.22M

VPV:

$177.29M

EPS

VLT:

$1.14

VPV:

$0.57

PE Ratio

VLT:

9.21

VPV:

17.40

PEG Ratio

VLT:

0.00

VPV:

0.00

PS Ratio

VLT:

8.85

VPV:

9.67

PB Ratio

VLT:

0.92

VPV:

0.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

VLT:

$3.69M

VPV:

$5.83M

Gross Profit (TTM)

VLT:

$3.18M

VPV:

$4.40M

EBITDA (TTM)

VLT:

$5.79M

VPV:

$11.86M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLT achieves a -0.67% return, which is significantly higher than VPV's -1.03% return. Over the past 10 years, VLT has outperformed VPV with an annualized return of 5.63%, while VPV has yielded a comparatively lower 2.64% annualized return.


VLT

YTD

-0.67%

1M

8.39%

6M

-3.52%

1Y

9.00%

5Y*

9.53%

10Y*

5.63%

VPV

YTD

-1.03%

1M

2.34%

6M

-7.00%

1Y

4.39%

5Y*

1.93%

10Y*

2.64%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

VLT vs. VPV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VLT is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VLT is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VLT is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VLT is 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VLT is 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VLT is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

VPV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VPV is 6161
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VPV is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VPV is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VPV is 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VPV is 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VPV is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

VLT vs. VPV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco High Income Trust II (VLT) and Invesco Pennsylvania Value Municipal Income Trust (VPV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current VLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is higher than the VPV Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLT and VPV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

VLT vs. VPV - Dividend Comparison

VLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.97%, more than VPV's 7.72% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
VLT
Invesco High Income Trust II
10.97%10.51%11.09%11.23%8.02%8.48%8.07%8.43%7.00%8.08%9.74%8.69%
VPV
Invesco Pennsylvania Value Municipal Income Trust
7.72%6.07%3.81%5.48%4.29%4.61%4.85%5.94%5.15%6.00%6.09%6.48%

Drawdowns

VLT vs. VPV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLT drawdown since its inception was -69.60%, which is greater than VPV's maximum drawdown of -45.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLT and VPV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

VLT vs. VPV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco High Income Trust II (VLT) has a higher volatility of 3.70% compared to Invesco Pennsylvania Value Municipal Income Trust (VPV) at 2.40%. This indicates that VLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VPV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

VLT vs. VPV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Invesco High Income Trust II and Invesco Pennsylvania Value Municipal Income Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00M4.00M6.00M8.00M10.00M12.00MAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJuly
3.69M
5.83M
(VLT) Total Revenue
(VPV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items