VLT vs. QQQM
VLT (Invesco High Income Trust II) is a stock, while QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 5 years, VLT returned 3.82%/yr vs 18.07%/yr for QQQM. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VLT vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VLT achieves a -2.21% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.39% return.
VLT
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- -2.21%
- 6M
- -0.98%
- 1Y
- 8.60%
- 3Y*
- 11.91%
- 5Y*
- 3.82%
- 10Y*
- 6.47%
QQQM
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 10.67%
- YTD
- 21.39%
- 6M
- 19.75%
- 1Y
- 41.98%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.07%
- 10Y*
- —
VLT vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VLT Invesco High Income Trust II | -2.21% | 13.22% | 17.38% | 13.12% | -20.82% | 14.53% | 11.19% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.39% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between VLT and QQQM is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | 0.45 |
The correlation between VLT and QQQM shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VLT vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
VLT
QQQM
VLT vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco High Income Trust II (VLT) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VLT | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.07 | 2.65 | -1.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.62 | 3.46 | -1.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.45 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 3.53 | -2.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.92 | 13.52 | -10.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VLT | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 2.65 | -1.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.82 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.85 | -0.70 |
Drawdowns
VLT vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VLT drawdown since its inception was -75.78%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLT and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VLT | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.78% | -35.04% | -40.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.55% | -11.96% | +1.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.41% | -22.70% | +9.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.46% | -35.04% | +4.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.42% | -0.20% | -3.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.95% | -8.25% | -8.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 3.11% | -0.16% |
Volatility
VLT vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco High Income Trust II (VLT) is 3.42%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that VLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VLT | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.42% | 4.48% | -1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.57% | 12.05% | -5.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.05% | 15.91% | -7.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.72% | 22.24% | -10.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.93% | 22.12% | -8.19% |
Dividends
VLT vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
VLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.78%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VLT Invesco High Income Trust II | 10.78% | 10.27% | 10.55% | 11.13% | 11.27% | 8.06% | 8.51% | 8.10% | 8.44% | 7.00% | 8.06% | 9.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VLT and QQQM have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQM has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to VLT (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLT dropped -75.78% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VLT and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer