PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VLT vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VLT vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco High Income Trust II (VLT) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VLT achieves a -2.21% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.39% return.


VLT

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.95%
YTD
-2.21%
6M
-0.98%
1Y
8.60%
3Y*
11.91%
5Y*
3.82%
10Y*
6.47%

QQQM

1D
-0.20%
1M
10.67%
YTD
21.39%
6M
19.75%
1Y
41.98%
3Y*
28.89%
5Y*
18.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VLT vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VLT
Invesco High Income Trust II
-2.21%13.22%17.38%13.12%-20.82%14.53%11.19%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
21.39%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.67%

Correlation

The correlation between VLT and QQQM is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020

0.45

The correlation between VLT and QQQM shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VLT vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VLT
VLT Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLT Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VLT vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco High Income Trust II (VLT) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VLTQQQMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.45

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

3.53

-2.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.92

13.52

-10.59

VLT vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VLT Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VLT and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VLTQQQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

2.65

-1.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.82

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.85

-0.70

Drawdowns

VLT vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VLT drawdown since its inception was -75.78%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLT and QQQM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VLTQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.78%

-35.04%

-40.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.55%

-11.96%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.41%

-22.70%

+9.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.46%

-35.04%

+4.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.42%

-0.20%

-3.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.95%

-8.25%

-8.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

3.11%

-0.16%

Volatility

VLT vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco High Income Trust II (VLT) is 3.42%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that VLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VLTQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.42%

4.48%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.57%

12.05%

-5.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.05%

15.91%

-7.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.72%

22.24%

-10.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.93%

22.12%

-8.19%

Dividends

VLT vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

VLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.78%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.41%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VLT
Invesco High Income Trust II
10.78%10.27%10.55%11.13%11.27%8.06%8.51%8.10%8.44%7.00%8.06%9.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


VLT and QQQM have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQM has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to VLT (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLT dropped -75.78% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VLT and QQQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer