NHS vs. CPMPX
NHS (Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund) and CPMPX (Changing Parameters Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, NHS returned 4.94%/yr vs 4.05%/yr for CPMPX. Their 0.29 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. NHS charges 4.14%/yr vs 2.90%/yr for CPMPX.
Performance
NHS vs. CPMPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NHS achieves a -10.96% return, which is significantly lower than CPMPX's 0.85% return. Over the past 10 years, NHS has outperformed CPMPX with an annualized return of 4.94%, while CPMPX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.05% annualized return.
NHS
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- 6M
- -13.90%
- YTD
- -10.96%
- 1Y
- -4.46%
- 3Y*
- 6.46%
- 5Y*
- -1.45%
- 10Y*
- 4.94%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.78%
CPMPX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 3.83%
- 3Y*
- 2.84%
- 5Y*
- 2.22%
- 10Y*
- 4.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.40%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $1.10M | $992.56K | $1.32M |
NHS vs. CPMPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NHS Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund | -10.96% | 14.81% | 11.04% | 6.12% | -22.99% | 15.78% | 4.57% | 39.03% | -11.45% | 8.64% |
CPMPX Changing Parameters Fund | 0.85% | 6.65% | -3.47% | 8.13% | -0.22% | 3.86% | 13.43% | 6.82% | -1.19% | 5.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between NHS and CPMPX is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010 | 0.29 |
The correlation between NHS and CPMPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (5 years) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NHS vs. CPMPX — Risk / Return Rank
NHS
CPMPX
NHS vs. CPMPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund (NHS) and Changing Parameters Fund (CPMPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NHS | CPMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.45 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | 2.87 | -3.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.54 | 7.80 | -8.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NHS vs. CPMPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NHS drawdown since its inception was -64.67%, which is greater than CPMPX's maximum drawdown of -8.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHS and CPMPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NHS | CPMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.67% | -8.87% | -55.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.01% | -1.31% | -15.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.01% | -8.13% | -8.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.43% | -8.13% | -29.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.97% | -8.13% | -34.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.34% | -1.09% | -15.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.90% | -1.86% | -7.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.05% | 0.48% | +8.57% |
Volatility
NHS vs. CPMPX - Volatility Comparison
Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund (NHS) has a higher volatility of 2.54% compared to Changing Parameters Fund (CPMPX) at 0.48%. This indicates that NHS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPMPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NHS | CPMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.54% | 0.48% | +2.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.64% | 1.32% | +8.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.91% | 1.85% | +11.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.09% | 3.84% | +12.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.69% | 3.11% | +13.58% |
NHS vs. CPMPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NHS has a 4.14% expense ratio, which is higher than CPMPX's 2.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
NHS vs. CPMPX - Dividend Comparison
NHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.04%, more than CPMPX's 3.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPMPX Changing Parameters Fund | 3.80% | 3.83% | 0.00% | 4.26% | 5.03% | 4.24% | 6.94% | 2.85% | 1.71% | 3.32% | 2.25% | 1.51% |
NHS Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund | 18.04% | 14.60% | 14.50% | 13.94% | 12.75% | 8.74% | 9.29% | 7.99% | 8.37% | 7.59% | 8.23% | 9.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NHS and CPMPX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NHS has higher volatility (2.54%) compared to CPMPX (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NHS dropped -64.67% vs CPMPX's -8.87%.
CPMPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NHS and CPMPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer