NHS vs. NLSIX
NHS (Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund) and NLSIX (Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund) are both mutual funds - NHS is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Neuberger Berman, while NLSIX is a Long-Short fund managed by Neuberger Berman. Over the past 10 years, NHS returned 4.75%/yr vs 6.77%/yr for NLSIX. Their 0.39 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. NHS charges 4.14%/yr vs 1.28%/yr for NLSIX.
Performance
NHS vs. NLSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NHS achieves a -10.67% return, which is significantly lower than NLSIX's 1.49% return. Over the past 10 years, NHS has underperformed NLSIX with an annualized return of 4.75%, while NLSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.77% annualized return.
NHS
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- 6M
- -13.27%
- YTD
- -10.67%
- 1Y
- -4.14%
- 3Y*
- 6.57%
- 5Y*
- -1.40%
- 10Y*
- 4.75%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.80%
NLSIX
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- 6M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 1Y
- 3.61%
- 3Y*
- 6.81%
- 5Y*
- 4.69%
- 10Y*
- 6.77%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.10M | $993.10K | $1.33M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
NHS vs. NLSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NHS Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund | -10.67% | 14.81% | 11.04% | 6.12% | -22.99% | 15.78% | 4.57% | 39.03% | -11.45% | 8.64% |
NLSIX Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund | 1.49% | 7.20% | 7.47% | 13.10% | -6.85% | 9.01% | 15.27% | 17.11% | -6.92% | 13.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between NHS and NLSIX is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2011 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NHS vs. NLSIX — Risk / Return Rank
NHS
NLSIX
NHS vs. NLSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund (NHS) and Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NHS | NLSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.11 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.24 | 0.76 | -1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.46 | 2.52 | -2.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NHS vs. NLSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NHS drawdown since its inception was -64.67%, which is greater than NLSIX's maximum drawdown of -14.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NHS and NLSIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NHS | NLSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.67% | -14.75% | -49.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.01% | -4.39% | -12.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.01% | -6.90% | -10.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.43% | -10.79% | -26.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.97% | -14.75% | -28.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.06% | -1.40% | -14.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.90% | -2.01% | -6.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.11% | 1.31% | +7.80% |
Volatility
NHS vs. NLSIX - Volatility Comparison
Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund (NHS) has a higher volatility of 2.57% compared to Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) at 2.21%. This indicates that NHS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NLSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NHS | NLSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.57% | 2.21% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.65% | 4.80% | +4.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.93% | 5.67% | +7.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.10% | 6.71% | +9.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.69% | 7.36% | +9.33% |
NHS vs. NLSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NHS has a 4.14% expense ratio, which is higher than NLSIX's 1.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
NHS vs. NLSIX - Dividend Comparison
NHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.98%, more than NLSIX's 0.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NHS Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund | 17.98% | 14.60% | 14.50% | 13.94% | 12.75% | 8.74% | 9.29% | 7.99% | 8.37% | 7.59% | 8.23% | 9.81% |
NLSIX Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.02% | 0.97% | 7.01% | 1.13% | 2.15% | 2.39% | 5.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NHS and NLSIX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NHS has higher volatility (2.57%) compared to NLSIX (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NHS dropped -64.67% vs NLSIX's -14.75%.
NLSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NHS and NLSIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer