VLAAX vs. RPFCX
VLAAX (Value Line Asset Allocation Fund) and RPFCX (Davis Appreciation & Income Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, VLAAX returned 7.04%/yr vs 10.69%/yr for RPFCX. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. VLAAX charges 1.04%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for RPFCX.
Performance
VLAAX vs. RPFCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VLAAX achieves a -3.92% return, which is significantly lower than RPFCX's 14.17% return. Over the past 10 years, VLAAX has underperformed RPFCX with an annualized return of 7.04%, while RPFCX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.69% annualized return.
VLAAX
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- 6M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- -3.92%
- 1Y
- -9.23%
- 3Y*
- 3.51%
- 5Y*
- 1.77%
- 10Y*
- 7.04%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.80%
RPFCX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 11.35%
- YTD
- 14.17%
- 1Y
- 29.00%
- 3Y*
- 16.53%
- 5Y*
- 10.09%
- 10Y*
- 10.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.48%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
VLAAX vs. RPFCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VLAAX Value Line Asset Allocation Fund | -3.92% | -2.61% | 9.36% | 21.52% | -15.70% | 11.77% | 15.24% | 25.40% | 2.00% | 14.94% |
RPFCX Davis Appreciation & Income Fund | 14.17% | 20.90% | 9.10% | 23.00% | -15.65% | 25.74% | 4.74% | 20.33% | -8.02% | 16.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between VLAAX and RPFCX is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 1993 | 0.77 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VLAAX and RPFCX has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VLAAX vs. RPFCX — Risk / Return Rank
VLAAX
RPFCX
VLAAX vs. RPFCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Value Line Asset Allocation Fund (VLAAX) and Davis Appreciation & Income Fund (RPFCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VLAAX | RPFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.54 | -0.70 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | 3.99 | -4.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.16 | 15.92 | -17.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VLAAX vs. RPFCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VLAAX drawdown since its inception was -43.95%, smaller than the maximum RPFCX drawdown of -56.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VLAAX and RPFCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VLAAX | RPFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.95% | -56.39% | +12.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.99% | -6.76% | -7.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.28% | -14.82% | -5.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.26% | -25.63% | +3.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.89% | -30.72% | +6.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.01% | -0.39% | -16.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.94% | -7.40% | +0.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.65% | 1.70% | +6.95% |
Volatility
VLAAX vs. RPFCX - Volatility Comparison
Value Line Asset Allocation Fund (VLAAX) has a higher volatility of 3.41% compared to Davis Appreciation & Income Fund (RPFCX) at 2.02%. This indicates that VLAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPFCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VLAAX | RPFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.41% | 2.02% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.27% | 6.74% | +0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.42% | 9.05% | +0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.71% | 14.04% | -0.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.93% | 14.75% | -1.82% |
VLAAX vs. RPFCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VLAAX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than RPFCX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
VLAAX vs. RPFCX - Dividend Comparison
VLAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.72%, more than RPFCX's 5.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPFCX Davis Appreciation & Income Fund | 5.67% | 6.09% | 1.11% | 2.91% | 2.63% | 0.28% | 0.78% | 2.03% | 1.09% | 0.83% | 1.09% | 1.19% |
VLAAX Value Line Asset Allocation Fund | 12.72% | 12.22% | 10.14% | 9.88% | 6.00% | 6.43% | 0.53% | 1.74% | 3.09% | 4.34% | 2.38% | 2.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VLAAX and RPFCX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VLAAX has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to RPFCX (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VLAAX dropped -43.95% vs RPFCX's -56.39%.
RPFCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VLAAX and RPFCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer