VIXM vs. SQQQ
VIXM (ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - VIXM is a Volatility fund tracking the S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures Index, while SQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VIXM returned -11.17%/yr vs -56.01%/yr for SQQQ. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VIXM charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SQQQ.
Performance
VIXM vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIXM achieves a 1.31% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -45.27% return. Over the past 10 years, VIXM has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of -11.17%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -56.01% annualized return.
VIXM
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 1.31%
- 6M
- -2.83%
- 1Y
- -8.35%
- 3Y*
- -13.22%
- 5Y*
- -13.49%
- 10Y*
- -11.17%
SQQQ
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -26.37%
- YTD
- -45.27%
- 6M
- -42.79%
- 1Y
- -65.16%
- 3Y*
- -56.19%
- 5Y*
- -49.17%
- 10Y*
- -56.01%
VIXM vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIXM ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF | 1.31% | 5.60% | -13.67% | -44.83% | -0.69% | -16.70% | 72.38% | -20.38% | 26.43% | -50.05% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -45.27% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -65.92% | -20.83% | -58.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIXM and SQQQ is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2011 | 0.67 |
The correlation between VIXM and SQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIXM vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
VIXM
SQQQ
VIXM vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF (VIXM) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VIXM | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.72 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | -0.99 | +0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | -1.82 | +0.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VIXM | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | -1.37 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.44 | -0.74 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.34 | -0.85 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.55 | -0.88 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
VIXM vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIXM drawdown since its inception was -96.23%, roughly equal to the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIXM and SQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIXM | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.23% | -100.00% | +3.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.22% | -65.95% | +50.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.41% | -92.38% | +50.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.40% | -97.23% | +33.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.72% | -99.98% | +24.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.75% | -100.00% | +4.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.52% | -92.40% | +10.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.74% | 35.73% | -26.99% |
Volatility
VIXM vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF (VIXM) is 3.19%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 13.75%. This indicates that VIXM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIXM | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 13.75% | -10.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.91% | 36.45% | -22.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.98% | 47.79% | -28.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.68% | 66.64% | -35.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.90% | 66.11% | -33.21% |
VIXM vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIXM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
VIXM vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
VIXM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.48%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 12.48% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% |
VIXM ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIXM and SQQQ have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQQQ has higher volatility (13.75%) compared to VIXM (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIXM dropped -96.23% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, VIXM leads with -11.17% vs -56.01% for SQQQ. On fees, VIXM is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, VIXM has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VIXM has performed better with a -11.17% return vs -56.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIXM is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 12.48%, compared with 0.00% for VIXM.
VIXM is categorized as Volatility, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. VIXM tracks S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures Index, while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 0.85% for VIXM and 0.95% for SQQQ.
VIXM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.44 vs -1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIXM and SQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer