PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VITL vs. SHIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VITL vs. SHIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) and Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VITL achieves a -66.81% return, which is significantly lower than SHIP's 82.14% return.


VITL

1D
-3.64%
1M
27.25%
YTD
-66.81%
6M
-69.10%
1Y
-67.07%
3Y*
-8.37%
5Y*
-13.31%
10Y*

SHIP

1D
6.03%
1M
3.44%
YTD
82.14%
6M
73.58%
1Y
153.69%
3Y*
65.24%
5Y*
14.64%
10Y*
-41.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VITL vs. SHIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VITL
Vital Farms, Inc.
-66.81%-15.26%140.22%5.16%-17.39%-28.64%-27.69%
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
82.14%38.48%-3.81%61.04%-36.53%70.83%-64.40%

Correlation

The correlation between VITL and SHIP is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2020

0.06

The correlation between VITL and SHIP shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.07 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VITL:

$472.63M

SHIP:

$345.21M

EPS

VITL:

$1.05

SHIP:

$1.00

PE Ratio

VITL:

10.11

SHIP:

16.52

PEG Ratio

VITL:

0.02

SHIP:

0.05

PS Ratio

VITL:

0.62

SHIP:

2.16

PB Ratio

VITL:

1.43

SHIP:

1.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

VITL:

$784.41M

SHIP:

$158.10M

Gross Profit (TTM)

VITL:

$276.18M

SHIP:

$62.63M

EBITDA (TTM)

VITL:

$82.41M

SHIP:

$78.01M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VITL vs. SHIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VITL
VITL Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
VITL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VITL Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
VITL Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
VITL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
VITL Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

SHIP
SHIP Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SHIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHIP Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SHIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHIP Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VITL vs. SHIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) and Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VITLSHIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.76

1.50

-0.74

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.80

8.33

-9.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.39

20.43

-21.82

VITL vs. SHIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VITL Sharpe Ratio is -1.09, which is lower than the SHIP Sharpe Ratio of 3.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VITL and SHIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VITL vs. SHIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VITL drawdown since its inception was -84.20%, smaller than the maximum SHIP drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VITL and SHIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VITLSHIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.20%

-100.00%

+15.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.20%

-18.56%

-65.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.20%

-57.61%

-26.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.20%

-69.11%

-15.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.77%

-99.98%

+20.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.34%

-86.56%

+39.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

48.17%

7.55%

+40.62%

Volatility

VITL vs. SHIP - Volatility Comparison

Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) has a higher volatility of 17.37% compared to Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) at 16.12%. This indicates that VITL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VITLSHIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.37%

16.12%

+1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.28%

33.91%

+14.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.63%

42.69%

+18.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.16%

51.91%

+2.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.73%

98.54%

-44.81%

Dividends

VITL vs. SHIP - Dividend Comparison

VITL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SHIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
2.60%3.58%10.58%1.28%25.23%
VITL
Vital Farms, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

VITL vs. SHIP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vital Farms, Inc. and Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
187.16M
49.42M
(VITL) Total Revenue
(SHIP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

VITL vs. SHIP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Vital Farms, Inc. and Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
28.3%
51.8%
Portfolio components
VITL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vital Farms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 53.01M and revenue of 187.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.3%.

SHIP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 25.59M and revenue of 49.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.8%.

VITL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vital Farms, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.33M and revenue of 187.16M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.3%.

SHIP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of 18.53M and revenue of 49.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 37.5%.

VITL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vital Farms, Inc. reported a net income of -1.52M and revenue of 187.16M, resulting in a net margin of -0.8%.

SHIP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. reported a net income of 12.31M and revenue of 49.42M, resulting in a net margin of 24.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VITL and SHIP have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VITL has higher volatility (17.37%) compared to SHIP (16.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VITL dropped -84.20% vs SHIP's -100.00%.

SHIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.62 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VITL and SHIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer