VITL vs. RYCEY
VITL (Vital Farms, Inc.) and RYCEY (Rolls-Royce Holdings plc) are both stocks. VITL operates in Farm Products (Consumer Defensive), while RYCEY operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, VITL returned -15.28%/yr vs 60.04%/yr for RYCEY. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VITL vs. RYCEY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VITL achieves a -68.50% return, which is significantly lower than RYCEY's 6.89% return.
VITL
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 12.53%
- YTD
- -68.50%
- 6M
- -68.29%
- 1Y
- -67.42%
- 3Y*
- -10.77%
- 5Y*
- -15.28%
- 10Y*
- —
RYCEY
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- YTD
- 6.89%
- 6M
- 11.28%
- 1Y
- 38.97%
- 3Y*
- 110.24%
- 5Y*
- 60.04%
- 10Y*
- 7.82%
VITL vs. RYCEY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VITL Vital Farms, Inc. | -68.50% | -15.26% | 140.22% | 5.16% | -17.39% | -28.64% | -28.22% |
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | 6.89% | 123.64% | 88.21% | 253.27% | -33.95% | 2.53% | -48.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between VITL and RYCEY is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2020 | 0.14 |
The correlation between VITL and RYCEY shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.16 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
VITL:
$448.55M
RYCEY:
$140.58B
VITL:
$1.05
RYCEY:
$0.99
VITL:
9.60
RYCEY:
16.89
VITL:
0.02
RYCEY:
0.03
VITL:
0.59
RYCEY:
3.52
VITL:
1.36
RYCEY:
51.66
VITL:
$784.41M
RYCEY:
$40.04B
VITL:
$276.18M
RYCEY:
$10.10B
VITL:
$82.41M
RYCEY:
$8.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VITL vs. RYCEY — Risk / Return Rank
VITL
RYCEY
VITL vs. RYCEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VITL | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 1.20 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | 1.80 | -2.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | 5.11 | -6.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VITL | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.10 | 1.04 | -2.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 | 1.39 | -1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.36 | -0.23 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
VITL vs. RYCEY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VITL drawdown since its inception was -84.20%, smaller than the maximum RYCEY drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VITL and RYCEY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VITL | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.20% | -99.07% | +14.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.20% | -21.75% | -62.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.20% | -23.37% | -60.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.20% | -62.01% | -22.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -94.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.81% | -78.78% | -2.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.28% | -84.19% | +36.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 47.12% | 7.65% | +39.47% |
Volatility
VITL vs. RYCEY - Volatility Comparison
Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) has a higher volatility of 18.45% compared to Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) at 11.26%. This indicates that VITL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYCEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VITL | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.45% | 11.26% | +7.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.11% | 32.56% | +15.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.49% | 37.74% | +23.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.16% | 43.44% | +10.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.74% | 49.35% | +4.39% |
Dividends
VITL vs. RYCEY - Dividend Comparison
VITL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RYCEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | 0.76% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.51% | 1.56% | 1.32% | 1.55% | 4.19% | 14.44% |
VITL Vital Farms, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
VITL vs. RYCEY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vital Farms, Inc. and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
VITL vs. RYCEY - Profitability Comparison
VITL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vital Farms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 53.01M and revenue of 187.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.3%.
RYCEY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 3.19B and revenue of 11.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.
VITL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vital Farms, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.33M and revenue of 187.16M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.3%.
RYCEY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported an operating income of 3.23B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.
VITL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vital Farms, Inc. reported a net income of -1.52M and revenue of 187.16M, resulting in a net margin of -0.8%.
RYCEY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a net income of 1.42B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
VITL and RYCEY have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VITL has higher volatility (18.45%) compared to RYCEY (11.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VITL dropped -84.20% vs RYCEY's -99.07%.
RYCEY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VITL and RYCEY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer