VITAX vs. FMAT

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

VITAX (Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund Admiral Shares) and FMAT (Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF) are both funds - VITAX is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Information Technology 25/50 Index, while FMAT is a Materials fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Materials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VITAX returned 25.13%/yr vs 10.55%/yr for FMAT. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VITAX charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FMAT.

Performance

VITAX vs. FMAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund Admiral Shares (VITAX) and Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VITAX achieves a 23.40% return, which is significantly higher than FMAT's 13.63% return. Over the past 10 years, VITAX has outperformed FMAT with an annualized return of 25.13%, while FMAT has yielded a comparatively lower 10.55% annualized return.

VITAX

• 1D: 3.34%
• 1M: 0.79%
• YTD: 23.40%
• 6M: 23.48%
• 1Y: 49.63%
• 3Y*: 29.93%
• 5Y*: 20.22%
• 10Y*: 25.13%

FMAT

• 1D: 1.73%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 13.63%
• 6M: 14.23%
• 1Y: 23.84%
• 3Y*: 11.38%
• 5Y*: 6.23%
• 10Y*: 10.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VITAX vs. FMAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VITAX Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund Admiral Shares	23.40%	21.78%	29.26%	52.69%	-29.67%	30.36%	45.93%	48.72%	2.51%	37.07%
FMAT Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF	13.63%	12.11%	0.47%	13.71%	-11.54%	27.45%	19.57%	23.35%	-17.40%	23.51%

Correlation

The correlation between VITAX and FMAT is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013	0.60

The correlation between VITAX and FMAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VITAX vs. FMAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VITAX	FMAT
Technology	98.5%	0.1%
Communication Services	0.5%	-
Financial Services	0.5%	-
Industrials	0.4%	0.1%
Energy	0.3%	0.6%
Consumer Cyclical	0.1%	8.3%
Basic Materials	0.0%	90.1%
Healthcare	0.0%	0.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

VITAX vs. FMAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VITAX

VITAX Risk / Return Rank: 71
VITAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
VITAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
VITAX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
VITAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
VITAX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

FMAT

FMAT Risk / Return Rank: 37
FMAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
FMAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
FMAT Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FMAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
FMAT Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VITAX vs. FMAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund Admiral Shares (VITAX) and Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VITAX	FMAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	1.20	+0.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	1.76	+0.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.21	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.96	1.65	+1.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.18	5.27	+3.91

VITAX vs. FMAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VITAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the FMAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VITAX and FMAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VITAX vs. FMAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VITAX drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, which is greater than FMAT's maximum drawdown of -41.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VITAX and FMAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	VITAX	FMAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.81%	-41.11%	-13.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.38%	-13.48%	-2.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.38%	-23.17%	-4.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.10%	-25.40%	-9.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.10%	-41.11%	+6.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.67%	-3.48%	-4.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.01%	-6.87%	-1.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.27%	4.21%	+1.06%

Volatility

VITAX vs. FMAT - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund Admiral Shares (VITAX) has a higher volatility of 10.02% compared to Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT) at 7.54%. This indicates that VITAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VITAX	FMAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.02%	7.54%	+2.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.08%	14.80%	+3.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.10%	18.44%	+3.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.62%	19.74%	+5.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.96%	21.25%	+3.71%

VITAX vs. FMAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VITAX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than FMAT's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VITAX vs. FMAT - Dividend Comparison

VITAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than FMAT's 1.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FMAT Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF	1.41%	1.64%	1.68%	1.71%	2.00%	1.44%	1.73%	1.89%	2.18%	1.53%	1.78%	2.16%
VITAX Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund Admiral Shares	0.33%	0.40%	0.60%	0.65%	0.91%	0.63%	0.82%	1.11%	1.29%	0.99%	1.31%	1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VITAX and FMAT in my portfolio?

VITAX and FMAT have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VITAX or FMAT?

VITAX has higher volatility (10.02%) compared to FMAT (7.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VITAX dropped -54.81% vs FMAT's -41.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VITAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.