VITAX vs. VTSAX

In the year-to-date period, VITAX achieves a -22.90% return, which is significantly lower than VTSAX's -13.95% return. Over the past 10 years, VITAX has outperformed VTSAX with an annualized return of 17.46%, while VTSAX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.59% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VITAX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VTSAX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund Admiral Shares (VITAX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current VITAX Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the VTSAX Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VITAX and VTSAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

VITAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than VTSAX's 1.50% yield.

The maximum VITAX drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, roughly equal to the maximum VTSAX drawdown of -55.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VITAX and VTSAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund Admiral Shares (VITAX) has a higher volatility of 12.55% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTSAX) at 9.48%. This indicates that VITAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.