VIS vs. TMRAF
VIS (Vanguard Industrials ETF) is Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index, while TMRAF (Tomra Systems ASA) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, VIS returned 14.22%/yr vs 13.73%/yr for TMRAF. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VIS vs. TMRAF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIS achieves a 15.65% return, which is significantly higher than TMRAF's -25.86% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VIS having a 14.22% annualized return and TMRAF not far behind at 13.73%.
VIS
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- YTD
- 15.65%
- 6M
- 14.50%
- 1Y
- 28.67%
- 3Y*
- 21.45%
- 5Y*
- 13.11%
- 10Y*
- 14.22%
TMRAF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 10.49%
- YTD
- -25.86%
- 6M
- -21.73%
- 1Y
- -41.87%
- 3Y*
- -12.60%
- 5Y*
- -9.33%
- 10Y*
- 13.73%
VIS vs. TMRAF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 15.65% | 18.57% | 16.85% | 22.50% | -8.57% | 20.80% | 12.34% | 30.09% | -14.01% | 21.47% |
TMRAF Tomra Systems ASA | -25.86% | 7.13% | 13.87% | -32.05% | -27.02% | 50.97% | 51.54% | 46.27% | 48.12% | 82.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIS and TMRAF is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2007 | 0.08 |
The correlation between VIS and TMRAF shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.10 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIS vs. TMRAF — Risk / Return Rank
VIS
TMRAF
VIS vs. TMRAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) and Tomra Systems ASA (TMRAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VIS | TMRAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.81 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | -0.89 | +3.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.28 | -1.62 | +10.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VIS vs. TMRAF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIS drawdown since its inception was -63.51%, smaller than the maximum TMRAF drawdown of -71.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIS and TMRAF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIS | TMRAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.51% | -71.64% | +8.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.29% | -47.39% | +35.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.80% | -56.94% | +36.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.96% | -71.64% | +48.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.42% | -71.64% | +29.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -59.80% | +59.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.37% | -20.67% | +12.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 25.82% | -22.85% |
Volatility
VIS vs. TMRAF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) is 6.71%, while Tomra Systems ASA (TMRAF) has a volatility of 19.08%. This indicates that VIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMRAF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIS | TMRAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.71% | 19.08% | -12.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.28% | 40.28% | -26.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.20% | 52.03% | -34.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 58.61% | -40.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 49.87% | -29.39% |
Dividends
VIS vs. TMRAF - Dividend Comparison
VIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than TMRAF's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMRAF Tomra Systems ASA | 0.23% | 1.55% | 1.39% | 1.49% | 1.94% | 1.01% | 0.62% | 1.62% | 4.28% | 13.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 0.88% | 1.01% | 1.23% | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 1.90% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 1.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIS and TMRAF have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMRAF has higher volatility (19.08%) compared to VIS (6.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIS dropped -63.51% vs TMRAF's -71.64%.
VIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIS and TMRAF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer