PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TMRAF vs. RMS.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

TMRAF vs. RMS.PA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Tomra Systems ASA (TMRAF) and Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA).

Performance

TMRAF vs. RMS.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tomra Systems ASA (TMRAF) and Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TMRAF vs. RMS.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMRAF
Tomra Systems ASA		-18.55%7.13%13.87%-32.05%-27.02%50.97%51.54%46.27%48.12%82.30%
RMS.PA
Hermès International Société en commandite par actions		-25.11%4.75%14.81%37.91%-11.00%63.46%44.70%35.80%4.80%31.75%
Different Trading Currencies

TMRAF is traded in USD, while RMS.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the RMS.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMRAF achieves a -18.55% return, which is significantly higher than RMS.PA's -25.11% return. Over the past 10 years, TMRAF has underperformed RMS.PA with an annualized return of 16.57%, while RMS.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 19.20% annualized return.

TMRAF

1D
0.00%
1M
-10.15%
YTD
-18.55%
6M
-25.86%
1Y
-21.66%
3Y*
-11.15%
5Y*
-4.00%
10Y*
16.57%

RMS.PA

1D
0.17%
1M
-23.09%
YTD
-25.11%
6M
-23.63%
1Y
-27.75%
3Y*
-1.76%
5Y*
11.47%
10Y*
19.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Tomra Systems ASA

Hermès International Société en commandite par actions

Often compared with RMS.PA:
RMS.PA vs. MC.PARMS.PA vs. LVMUYRMS.PA vs. SPYRMS.PA vs. OR.PARMS.PA vs. RACERMS.PA vs. PRGSRMS.PA vs. KER.PA

Return for Risk

TMRAF vs. RMS.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TMRAF
TMRAF Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TMRAF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMRAF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMRAF Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
TMRAF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMRAF Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
RMS.PA
RMS.PA Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
RMS.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMS.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMS.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
RMS.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMS.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMRAF vs. RMS.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tomra Systems ASA (TMRAF) and Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

TMRAFRMS.PADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.46

-0.96

+0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.38

-1.29

+0.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

0.85

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.80

-0.76

-0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.50

-1.85

+0.34

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TMRAF vs. RMS.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMRAF Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is higher than the RMS.PA Sharpe Ratio of -0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMRAF and RMS.PA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

TMRAFRMS.PADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.46

-0.96

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.37

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.71

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.53

-0.30

Correlation

The correlation between TMRAF and RMS.PA is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TMRAF vs. RMS.PA - Dividend Comparison

TMRAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than RMS.PA's 1.71% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TMRAF
Tomra Systems ASA		1.90%1.55%1.39%1.49%1.94%1.01%0.62%1.62%4.28%13.33%0.00%0.00%
RMS.PA
Hermès International Société en commandite par actions		1.71%1.23%1.08%0.68%0.55%0.30%0.52%0.68%1.34%0.84%0.86%0.95%

Drawdowns

TMRAF vs. RMS.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMRAF drawdown since its inception was -71.64%, which is greater than RMS.PA's maximum drawdown of -50.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMRAF and RMS.PA.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

TMRAFRMS.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.64%

-47.65%

-23.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.64%

-37.88%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.64%

-42.60%

-29.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.64%

-42.60%

-29.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.85%

-42.60%

-13.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.30%

-10.89%

-9.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.43%

17.61%

+2.82%

Volatility

TMRAF vs. RMS.PA - Volatility Comparison

Tomra Systems ASA (TMRAF) has a higher volatility of 18.03% compared to Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA) at 9.14%. This indicates that TMRAF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RMS.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

TMRAFRMS.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.03%

9.14%

+8.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.65%

20.57%

+14.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.78%

28.74%

+20.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.41%

30.33%

+27.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.18%

26.54%

+22.64%

Financials

TMRAF vs. RMS.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tomra Systems ASA and Hermès International Société en commandite par actions. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

Please note, different currencies. TMRAF values in USD, RMS.PA values in EUR