VIS vs. FDRV
VIS (Vanguard Industrials ETF) and FDRV (Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VIS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index, while FDRV is a Transportation Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. VIS is passively managed, while FDRV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, VIS returned 22.65%/yr vs 7.44%/yr for FDRV. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VIS charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FDRV.
Performance
VIS vs. FDRV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIS achieves a 14.99% return, which is significantly lower than FDRV's 32.06% return.
VIS
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 14.99%
- 6M
- 16.70%
- 1Y
- 28.58%
- 3Y*
- 22.65%
- 5Y*
- 12.78%
- 10Y*
- 14.09%
FDRV
- 1D
- 3.68%
- 1M
- 12.17%
- YTD
- 32.06%
- 6M
- 32.82%
- 1Y
- 57.85%
- 3Y*
- 7.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VIS vs. FDRV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 14.99% | 18.57% | 16.85% | 22.50% | -8.57% | 4.97% |
FDRV Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF | 32.06% | 24.32% | -21.73% | 12.27% | -44.23% | 7.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIS and FDRV is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2021 | 0.71 |
The correlation between VIS and FDRV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
VIS vs. FDRV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VIS
FDRV
Industrials
Technology
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Industrials
VIS
FDRV
Technology
VIS
FDRV
Utilities
VIS
FDRV
-
Consumer Cyclical
VIS
FDRV
Financial Services
VIS
FDRV
-
Energy
VIS
FDRV
-
Basic Materials
VIS
FDRV
Communication Services
VIS
FDRV
-
Real Estate
VIS
FDRV
-
Healthcare
VIS
FDRV
-
Consumer Defensive
VIS
-
FDRV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIS vs. FDRV — Risk / Return Rank
VIS
FDRV
VIS vs. FDRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) and Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VIS | FDRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.75 | 2.32 | -0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.51 | 3.01 | -0.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.38 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 3.66 | -1.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.60 | 11.36 | -1.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VIS | FDRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 2.32 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | -0.10 | +0.62 |
Drawdowns
VIS vs. FDRV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIS drawdown since its inception was -63.51%, roughly equal to the maximum FDRV drawdown of -63.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIS and FDRV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIS | FDRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.51% | -63.89% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.29% | -15.62% | +3.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.80% | -48.45% | +27.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -26.94% | +26.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.38% | -42.36% | +33.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 5.03% | -2.08% |
Volatility
VIS vs. FDRV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) is 5.29%, while Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF (FDRV) has a volatility of 8.95%. This indicates that VIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDRV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIS | FDRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | 8.95% | -3.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.55% | 18.48% | -4.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.42% | 25.08% | -8.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 32.04% | -13.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.43% | 32.04% | -11.61% |
VIS vs. FDRV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIS has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FDRV's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
VIS vs. FDRV - Dividend Comparison
VIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than FDRV's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDRV Fidelity Electric Vehicles and Future Transportation ETF | 1.02% | 1.14% | 0.43% | 0.24% | 0.33% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 0.89% | 1.01% | 1.23% | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 1.90% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 1.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIS and FDRV have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDRV has higher volatility (8.95%) compared to VIS (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIS dropped -63.51% vs FDRV's -63.89%.
On 3-year performance, VIS leads with 22.65% vs 7.44% for FDRV. On fees, VIS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VIS has been the lower-risk option at 5.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VIS has performed better with a 22.65% return vs 7.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FDRV.
FDRV has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.89% for VIS.
VIS is categorized as Industrials Equities, while FDRV is Transportation Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VIS and 0.39% for FDRV.
FDRV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIS and FDRV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer