PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIOV vs. XSVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIOV vs. XSVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIOV achieves a 20.41% return, which is significantly lower than XSVM's 25.81% return. Over the past 10 years, VIOV has underperformed XSVM with an annualized return of 10.33%, while XSVM has yielded a comparatively higher 13.34% annualized return.


VIOV

1D
0.17%
1M
0.49%
6M
12.83%
YTD
20.41%
1Y
39.50%
3Y*
12.68%
5Y*
8.14%
10Y*
10.33%
ALL TIME*
11.84%

XSVM

1D
-0.35%
1M
2.37%
6M
17.50%
YTD
25.81%
1Y
41.62%
3Y*
14.54%
5Y*
9.57%
10Y*
13.34%
ALL TIME*
9.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.48M$4.51M$5.05M
$2.60M$2.40M$2.07M

VIOV vs. XSVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIOV
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
20.41%6.63%7.44%15.36%-11.37%30.67%2.81%24.44%-12.85%11.54%
XSVM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF
25.81%7.47%2.30%20.20%-13.63%56.36%5.08%30.01%-12.33%3.62%

Correlation

The correlation between VIOV and XSVM is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.90

The correlation between VIOV and XSVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

VIOV vs. XSVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VIOV
XSVM

Financial Services

20.3%
45.1%

Consumer Cyclical

15.3%
18.1%

Technology

13.5%
2.6%

Industrials

12.2%
5.3%

Real Estate

8.5%
9.7%

Healthcare

7.5%
1.7%

Basic Materials

6.1%
3.0%

Energy

6.0%
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
4.1%

Communication Services

3.8%
2.6%

Utilities

2.0%
2.1%

Financial Services

VIOV
20.3%
XSVM
45.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VIOV
15.3%
XSVM
18.1%

Technology

VIOV
13.5%
XSVM
2.6%

Industrials

VIOV
12.2%
XSVM
5.3%

Real Estate

VIOV
8.5%
XSVM
9.7%

Healthcare

VIOV
7.5%
XSVM
1.7%

Basic Materials

VIOV
6.1%
XSVM
3.0%

Energy

VIOV
6.0%
XSVM
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

VIOV
5.0%
XSVM
4.1%

Communication Services

VIOV
3.8%
XSVM
2.6%

Utilities

VIOV
2.0%
XSVM
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIOV vs. XSVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VIOV
VIOV Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
VIOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIOV Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VIOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIOV Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

XSVM
XSVM Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
XSVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSVM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
XSVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VIOV vs. XSVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VIOVXSVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.39

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.00

3.91

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.68

12.49

+1.19

VIOV vs. XSVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIOV Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the XSVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIOV and XSVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VIOV vs. XSVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIOV drawdown since its inception was -47.36%, smaller than the maximum XSVM drawdown of -62.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIOV and XSVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIOVXSVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.36%

-62.57%

+15.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.33%

-10.08%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.44%

-26.21%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.44%

-26.21%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.36%

-49.02%

+1.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

-1.45%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.31%

-11.48%

+4.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

3.15%

-0.43%

Volatility

VIOV vs. XSVM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV) is 3.57%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) has a volatility of 4.18%. This indicates that VIOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIOVXSVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

4.18%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.07%

11.73%

-0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.78%

17.89%

-0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.67%

22.33%

-0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.82%

25.00%

-1.18%

VIOV vs. XSVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIOV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XSVM's 0.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

VIOV vs. XSVM - Dividend Comparison

VIOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than XSVM's 1.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VIOV
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
1.68%1.69%1.78%2.18%1.81%1.59%1.42%1.60%1.76%1.43%1.17%1.32%
XSVM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF
1.75%2.29%1.69%1.31%1.79%1.23%1.21%1.22%2.54%1.90%2.29%2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VIOV and XSVM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XSVM has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to VIOV (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIOV dropped -47.36% vs XSVM's -62.57%.

On 10-year performance, XSVM leads with 13.34% vs 10.33% for VIOV. On fees, VIOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VIOV has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XSVM has performed better with a 13.34% return vs 10.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for XSVM.

XSVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.68% for VIOV.

VIOV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while XSVM is Momentum. VIOV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while XSVM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VIOV and 0.37% for XSVM.

XSVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIOV and XSVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer