VIOV vs. IJS
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV) and iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS).
VIOV and IJS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VIOV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. IJS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600/Citigroup Value Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2000. Both VIOV and IJS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VIOV or IJS.
Key characteristics
| VIOV | IJS | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.49 | 1.23 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.21 | 1.86 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.27 | 1.22 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.57 | 2.05 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.73 | 5.58 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.70% | 4.63% |
| Daily Std Dev | 21.00% | 21.02% |
| Max Drawdown | -47.36% | -60.11% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.36% | -1.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIOV and IJS is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VIOV vs. IJS - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIOV achieves a 15.70% return, which is significantly higher than IJS's 14.65% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VIOV having a 9.16% annualized return and IJS not far behind at 8.90%.
VIOV
15.70%
10.66%
18.47%
27.51%
10.60%
9.16%
IJS
14.65%
9.86%
19.17%
24.13%
10.08%
8.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VIOV vs. IJS - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIOV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IJS's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VIOV vs. IJS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV) and iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VIOV vs. IJS - Dividend Comparison
VIOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, more than IJS's 1.39% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIOV Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | 2.12% | 2.18% | 1.81% | 1.59% | 1.42% | 1.60% | 1.76% | 1.43% | 1.17% | 1.32% | 1.27% | 0.91% |
IJS iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF | 1.39% | 1.42% | 1.47% | 1.52% | 1.00% | 1.66% | 1.75% | 1.41% | 1.22% | 1.59% | 1.41% | 1.18% |
Drawdowns
VIOV vs. IJS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIOV drawdown since its inception was -47.36%, smaller than the maximum IJS drawdown of -60.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIOV and IJS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VIOV vs. IJS - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV) and iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) have volatilities of 7.48% and 7.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.