VIG vs. ZDY.TO
VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) and ZDY.TO (BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD)) are both Dividend funds. VIG is passively managed, while ZDY.TO is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, VIG returned 13.24%/yr vs 9.64%/yr for ZDY.TO. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VIG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ZDY.TO.
Performance
VIG vs. ZDY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VIG is traded in USD, while ZDY.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ZDY.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIG achieves a 7.68% return, which is significantly lower than ZDY.TO's 15.43% return. Over the past 10 years, VIG has outperformed ZDY.TO with an annualized return of 13.24%, while ZDY.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 9.64% annualized return.
VIG
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 7.68%
- 6M
- 6.99%
- 1Y
- 18.23%
- 3Y*
- 15.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.74%
- 10Y*
- 13.24%
ZDY.TO
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- YTD
- 15.43%
- 6M
- 4.22%
- 1Y
- 15.71%
- 3Y*
- 14.18%
- 5Y*
- 9.01%
- 10Y*
- 9.64%
VIG vs. ZDY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 7.68% | 14.17% | 16.99% | 14.51% | -9.80% | 23.76% | 15.43% | 29.62% | -2.08% | 22.22% |
ZDY.TO BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD) | 15.43% | 3.87% | 16.38% | 7.13% | -4.42% | 22.98% | -2.88% | 21.97% | -4.77% | 14.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIG and ZDY.TO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2013 | 0.60 |
The correlation between VIG and ZDY.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
VIG vs. ZDY.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VIG
ZDY.TO
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
VIG
ZDY.TO
Financial Services
VIG
ZDY.TO
Healthcare
VIG
ZDY.TO
Industrials
VIG
ZDY.TO
Consumer Defensive
VIG
ZDY.TO
Consumer Cyclical
VIG
ZDY.TO
Energy
VIG
ZDY.TO
Basic Materials
VIG
ZDY.TO
Utilities
VIG
ZDY.TO
Communication Services
VIG
ZDY.TO
Real Estate
VIG
-
ZDY.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIG vs. ZDY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VIG
ZDY.TO
VIG vs. ZDY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD) (ZDY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VIG | ZDY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.23 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.32 | 1.54 | +0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.34 | 4.02 | +5.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VIG vs. ZDY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIG drawdown since its inception was -46.81%, which is greater than ZDY.TO's maximum drawdown of -39.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIG and ZDY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIG | ZDY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.81% | -39.06% | -7.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.91% | -10.25% | +2.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.95% | -14.57% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.39% | -16.89% | -3.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.72% | -39.06% | +7.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -1.71% | +1.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.51% | -3.88% | -1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 3.92% | -1.96% |
Volatility
VIG vs. ZDY.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) is 2.93%, while BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD) (ZDY.TO) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that VIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZDY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIG | ZDY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.93% | 5.34% | -2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.78% | 11.22% | -3.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.19% | 13.34% | -3.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.25% | 13.83% | +0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.06% | 16.60% | -0.54% |
VIG vs. ZDY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than ZDY.TO's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
VIG vs. ZDY.TO - Dividend Comparison
VIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than ZDY.TO's 1.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.47% | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% |
ZDY.TO BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD) | 1.50% | 1.80% | 1.97% | 2.43% | 2.48% | 2.33% | 3.65% | 3.02% | 2.80% | 2.63% | 2.46% | 2.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIG and ZDY.TO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ZDY.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VIG and 0.30% for ZDY.TO.
Find the right allocation for VIG and ZDY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer