ZDY.TO vs. SCHD
ZDY.TO (BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD)) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both Dividend funds. ZDY.TO is actively managed, while SCHD is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZDY.TO returned 11.07%/yr vs 13.54%/yr for SCHD. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZDY.TO charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
ZDY.TO vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ZDY.TO is traded in CAD, while SCHD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHD values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZDY.TO achieves a 18.13% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 20.03% return. Over the past 10 years, ZDY.TO has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 11.07%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.54% annualized return.
ZDY.TO
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 9.13%
- YTD
- 18.13%
- 6M
- 10.45%
- 1Y
- 26.90%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- 13.55%
- 10Y*
- 11.07%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.32%
- YTD
- 20.03%
- 6M
- 17.69%
- 1Y
- 28.28%
- 3Y*
- 16.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.36%
- 10Y*
- 13.54%
ZDY.TO vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZDY.TO BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD) | 18.13% | 4.45% | 26.22% | 4.58% | 1.64% | 22.92% | -5.18% | 16.96% | 3.22% | 6.74% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 20.52% | -0.44% | 21.25% | 2.24% | 3.64% | 28.70% | 13.08% | 21.03% | 2.45% | 13.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZDY.TO and SCHD is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2013 | 0.77 |
The correlation between ZDY.TO and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.84 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ZDY.TO vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZDY.TO
SCHD
Technology
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Technology
ZDY.TO
SCHD
Healthcare
ZDY.TO
SCHD
Energy
ZDY.TO
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
ZDY.TO
SCHD
Financial Services
ZDY.TO
SCHD
Communication Services
ZDY.TO
SCHD
Utilities
ZDY.TO
SCHD
Real Estate
ZDY.TO
SCHD
-
Consumer Cyclical
ZDY.TO
SCHD
Industrials
ZDY.TO
SCHD
Basic Materials
ZDY.TO
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZDY.TO vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
ZDY.TO
SCHD
ZDY.TO vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD) (ZDY.TO) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZDY.TO | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.47 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.98 | 6.61 | -2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.78 | 19.13 | -5.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZDY.TO | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 2.57 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.12 | 0.90 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.90 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 1.12 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
ZDY.TO vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZDY.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.01%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -26.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZDY.TO and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZDY.TO | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.01% | -26.93% | -6.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.78% | -4.30% | -2.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.32% | -15.30% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.32% | -15.30% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.01% | -26.93% | -6.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -1.22% | +1.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.30% | -2.86% | -0.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 1.48% | +0.48% |
Volatility
ZDY.TO vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD) (ZDY.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.63%. This indicates that ZDY.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZDY.TO | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.73% | 2.63% | +2.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.85% | 8.23% | +1.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.85% | 11.10% | +0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.17% | 12.63% | -0.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 15.18% | 0.00% |
ZDY.TO vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZDY.TO has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZDY.TO vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
ZDY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than SCHD's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.26% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
ZDY.TO BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD) | 1.46% | 1.72% | 1.97% | 2.43% | 2.48% | 2.33% | 3.65% | 3.02% | 2.80% | 2.63% | 2.46% | 2.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZDY.TO and SCHD have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ZDY.TO.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ZDY.TO and 0.06% for SCHD.
Find the right allocation for ZDY.TO and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer