PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIG vs. VFMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIG vs. VFMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIG achieves a 7.57% return, which is significantly lower than VFMV's 8.53% return.


VIG

1D
-0.19%
1M
3.79%
YTD
7.57%
6M
6.99%
1Y
19.63%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
10.62%
10Y*
13.23%

VFMV

1D
-0.14%
1M
1.30%
YTD
8.53%
6M
8.37%
1Y
13.05%
3Y*
14.70%
5Y*
9.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIG vs. VFMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
7.57%14.17%16.99%14.51%-9.80%23.76%15.43%29.62%-3.60%
VFMV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF
8.53%10.52%16.91%8.86%-5.73%20.75%-0.19%27.26%-1.10%

Correlation

The correlation between VIG and VFMV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018

0.88

The correlation between VIG and VFMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

VIG vs. VFMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VIG
VFMV

Technology

26.2%
25.1%

Financial Services

20.6%
10.6%

Healthcare

16.5%
10.1%

Industrials

11.8%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

10.1%
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

4.7%
6.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.9%

Basic Materials

3.5%

-

Utilities

3.2%
6.7%

Communication Services

0.5%
10.7%

Real Estate

-

6.4%

Technology

VIG
26.2%
VFMV
25.1%

Financial Services

VIG
20.6%
VFMV
10.6%

Healthcare

VIG
16.5%
VFMV
10.1%

Industrials

VIG
11.8%
VFMV
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

VIG
10.1%
VFMV
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VIG
4.7%
VFMV
6.9%

Energy

VIG
3.5%
VFMV
3.9%

Basic Materials

VIG
3.5%
VFMV

-

Utilities

VIG
3.2%
VFMV
6.7%

Communication Services

VIG
0.5%
VFMV
10.7%

Real Estate

VIG

-

VFMV
6.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIG vs. VFMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIG
VIG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIG Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

VFMV
VFMV Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VFMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMV Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMV Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIG vs. VFMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VIGVFMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.26

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

2.18

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.06

8.57

+1.49

VIG vs. VFMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the VFMV Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIG and VFMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VIGVFMVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

1.49

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.84

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.69

-0.10

Drawdowns

VIG vs. VFMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIG drawdown since its inception was -46.81%, which is greater than VFMV's maximum drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIG and VFMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIGVFMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.81%

-33.64%

-13.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.91%

-6.00%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.95%

-10.35%

-4.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.39%

-15.41%

-4.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-1.02%

+0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.51%

-3.64%

-1.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

1.53%

+0.43%

Volatility

VIG vs. VFMV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) have volatilities of 2.19% and 2.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIGVFMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.19%

2.09%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.57%

6.30%

+1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.01%

8.80%

+1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.23%

11.75%

+2.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

14.25%

+1.80%

VIG vs. VFMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VFMV's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VIG vs. VFMV - Dividend Comparison

VIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than VFMV's 1.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFMV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF
1.93%2.12%1.46%2.20%2.08%1.31%2.14%2.43%2.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
1.47%1.62%1.73%1.88%1.96%1.55%1.63%1.71%2.08%1.88%2.14%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


VIG and VFMV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VIG has higher volatility (2.19%) compared to VFMV (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIG dropped -46.81% vs VFMV's -33.64%.

On 5-year performance, VIG leads with 10.62% vs 9.82% for VFMV. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VFMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VIG has performed better with a 10.62% return vs 9.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for VFMV.

VFMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 1.47% for VIG.

VIG is categorized as Dividend, while VFMV is Mid Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VIG and 0.13% for VFMV.

VIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIG and VFMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer