PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIG vs. PRDGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIG vs. PRDGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VIG having a 7.57% return and PRDGX slightly higher at 7.60%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VIG having a 13.23% annualized return and PRDGX not far behind at 12.87%.


VIG

1D
-0.19%
1M
3.79%
YTD
7.57%
6M
6.99%
1Y
19.63%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
10.62%
10Y*
13.23%

PRDGX

1D
0.79%
1M
3.23%
YTD
7.60%
6M
7.74%
1Y
17.14%
3Y*
15.54%
5Y*
10.09%
10Y*
12.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIG vs. PRDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
7.57%14.17%16.99%14.51%-9.80%23.76%15.43%29.62%-2.08%22.22%
PRDGX
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.
7.60%14.74%13.48%13.68%-10.22%26.03%13.92%31.76%-1.06%18.89%

Correlation

The correlation between VIG and PRDGX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2006

0.96

The correlation between VIG and PRDGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIG vs. PRDGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIG
VIG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIG Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

PRDGX
PRDGX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PRDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
PRDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIG vs. PRDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VIGPRDGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.32

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

2.41

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.06

9.85

+0.22

VIG vs. PRDGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the PRDGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIG and PRDGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VIGPRDGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

1.82

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.72

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.81

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.66

-0.06

Drawdowns

VIG vs. PRDGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIG drawdown since its inception was -46.81%, smaller than the maximum PRDGX drawdown of -49.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIG and PRDGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIGPRDGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.81%

-49.79%

+2.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.91%

-7.34%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.95%

-14.15%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.39%

-19.31%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.72%

-33.18%

+1.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

0.00%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.51%

-5.42%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

1.79%

+0.17%

Volatility

VIG vs. PRDGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) is 2.19%, while T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX) has a volatility of 2.33%. This indicates that VIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIGPRDGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.19%

2.33%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.57%

7.56%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.01%

9.72%

+0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.23%

14.06%

+0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

15.88%

+0.17%

VIG vs. PRDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than PRDGX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

VIG vs. PRDGX - Dividend Comparison

VIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than PRDGX's 7.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRDGX
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.
7.52%8.02%4.66%2.78%3.81%2.00%1.03%2.33%3.67%1.82%3.07%7.57%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
1.47%1.62%1.73%1.88%1.96%1.55%1.63%1.71%2.08%1.88%2.14%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, VIG and PRDGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PRDGX has higher volatility (2.33%) compared to VIG (2.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIG dropped -46.81% vs PRDGX's -49.79%.

VIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIG and PRDGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer