PRDGX vs. SCHD
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD).
PRDGX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Dec 30, 1992. SCHD is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. It was launched on Oct 20, 2011.
Performance
PRDGX vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRDGX vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRDGX T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. | -2.47% | 14.74% | 13.48% | 13.68% | -10.22% | 26.03% | 13.92% | 31.76% | -1.06% | 18.89% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 12.79% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRDGX achieves a -2.47% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 12.79% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PRDGX having a 12.09% annualized return and SCHD not far ahead at 12.31%.
PRDGX
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -7.31%
- YTD
- -2.47%
- 6M
- -0.01%
- 1Y
- 9.42%
- 3Y*
- 12.29%
- 5Y*
- 9.25%
- 10Y*
- 12.09%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- YTD
- 12.79%
- 6M
- 14.49%
- 1Y
- 13.97%
- 3Y*
- 12.05%
- 5Y*
- 8.44%
- 10Y*
- 12.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRDGX vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRDGX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRDGX vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
PRDGX
SCHD
PRDGX vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRDGX | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.71 | 0.89 | -0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.08 | 1.35 | -0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.19 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 1.19 | -0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.83 | 3.99 | -0.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRDGX | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 0.89 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.59 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.74 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.84 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRDGX and SCHD is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PRDGX vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
PRDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.30%, more than SCHD's 3.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRDGX T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. | 8.30% | 8.02% | 4.66% | 2.78% | 3.81% | 2.00% | 1.03% | 2.33% | 3.67% | 1.82% | 3.07% | 7.57% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.44% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Drawdowns
PRDGX vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRDGX drawdown since its inception was -49.79%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRDGX and SCHD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRDGX | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.79% | -33.37% | -16.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.28% | -12.74% | +1.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.31% | -16.85% | -2.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.18% | -33.37% | +0.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.32% | -2.89% | -4.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -3.34% | -2.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 3.89% | -1.55% |
Volatility
PRDGX vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX) has a higher volatility of 3.43% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.40%. This indicates that PRDGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRDGX | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.43% | 2.40% | +1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.35% | 7.96% | -0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.00% | 15.74% | -0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.05% | 14.40% | -0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.86% | 16.70% | -0.84% |