VIG vs. IYH
VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) and IYH (iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VIG is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while IYH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VIG returned 13.24%/yr vs 9.52%/yr for IYH. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VIG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for IYH.
Performance
VIG vs. IYH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIG achieves a 7.68% return, which is significantly higher than IYH's -0.65% return. Over the past 10 years, VIG has outperformed IYH with an annualized return of 13.24%, while IYH has yielded a comparatively lower 9.52% annualized return.
VIG
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 7.68%
- 6M
- 6.99%
- 1Y
- 18.23%
- 3Y*
- 15.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.74%
- 10Y*
- 13.24%
IYH
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- YTD
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- 1Y
- 14.13%
- 3Y*
- 6.45%
- 5Y*
- 4.89%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
VIG vs. IYH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 7.68% | 14.17% | 16.99% | 14.51% | -9.80% | 23.76% | 15.43% | 29.62% | -2.08% | 22.22% |
IYH iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF | -0.65% | 13.16% | 2.99% | 2.14% | -4.46% | 23.41% | 15.56% | 20.80% | 5.80% | 22.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIG and IYH is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2006 | 0.77 |
The correlation between VIG and IYH shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VIG vs. IYH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VIG
IYH
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
VIG
IYH
-
Financial Services
VIG
IYH
-
Healthcare
VIG
IYH
Industrials
VIG
IYH
-
Consumer Defensive
VIG
IYH
-
Consumer Cyclical
VIG
IYH
-
Energy
VIG
IYH
-
Basic Materials
VIG
IYH
-
Utilities
VIG
IYH
-
Communication Services
VIG
IYH
-
Real Estate
VIG
-
IYH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIG vs. IYH — Risk / Return Rank
VIG
IYH
VIG vs. IYH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VIG | IYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.17 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.32 | 1.33 | +0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.34 | 3.18 | +6.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VIG vs. IYH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIG drawdown since its inception was -46.81%, which is greater than IYH's maximum drawdown of -43.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIG and IYH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIG | IYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.81% | -43.12% | -3.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.91% | -10.64% | +2.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.95% | -17.91% | +2.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.39% | -17.91% | -2.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.72% | -28.40% | -3.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -3.94% | +3.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.51% | -8.96% | +3.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 4.46% | -2.50% |
Volatility
VIG vs. IYH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) is 2.93%, while iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) has a volatility of 4.94%. This indicates that VIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IYH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIG | IYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.93% | 4.94% | -2.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.78% | 10.64% | -2.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.19% | 15.10% | -4.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.25% | 14.96% | -0.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.06% | 16.74% | -0.68% |
VIG vs. IYH - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IYH's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
VIG vs. IYH - Dividend Comparison
VIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, more than IYH's 1.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYH iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF | 1.25% | 1.19% | 1.25% | 1.18% | 1.10% | 0.94% | 1.16% | 1.14% | 1.95% | 1.10% | 1.29% | 2.02% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.47% | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIG and IYH have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IYH has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to VIG (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIG dropped -46.81% vs IYH's -43.12%.
On 10-year performance, VIG leads with 13.24% vs 9.52% for IYH. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VIG has performed better with a 13.24% return vs 9.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IYH.
VIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 1.25% for IYH.
VIG is categorized as Dividend, while IYH is Health & Biotech Equities. VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while IYH tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VIG and 0.43% for IYH.
VIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIG and IYH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer